User talk:WikiEditorPublicGood999

March 2021
Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for reverting your recent experiment. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use your sandbox instead, as someone could see your edit before you revert it. Thank you. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:45, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Las Cruces Academy


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Las Cruces Academy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. – Pbrks (t • c) 05:03, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Las Cruces Academy


A tag has been placed on Las Cruces Academy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Laptopinmyhands (talk) 15:02, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Las Cruces Academy


A tag has been placed on Las Cruces Academy, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. CUPIDICAE💕 15:11, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

Contest to deletion
There is no advertising.. I am publishing this as a former student at the school, and coming without bias from any sides.

March 2022
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Modussiccandi (talk) 15:48, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, as you did at Las Cruces Academy, you may be blocked from editing. CUPIDICAE💕 17:14, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus, as you did to Kherson offensive. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains underway. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Thank you. Curbon7 (talk) 01:31, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

Reply to Modussiccandi
This is not promotional material, this is informational material. If I was allowed to continue with this article it could be improved more. Thanks!

Proposed deletion of Las Cruces Academy


The article Las Cruces Academy has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Does not meet WP:GNG - Neither source is independent and the article may be promotional."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. casualdejekyll 16:26, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

'I will fix the issues within the next 24 hours if this page is not deleted. Thanks.'

Speedy deletion nomination of Las Cruces Academy


A tag has been placed on Las Cruces Academy, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. CUPIDICAE💕 16:31, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

This is not promotional material!
'Promotional material is for personal gain, this is not causing any personal gain, I do not see how this speedy deletion request is valid. Thanks!'
 * No, incorrect. "Personal gain" has nothing to do with it. Drmies (talk) 18:41, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

March 2022
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. MarnetteD&#124;Talk 20:11, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Las Cruces Academy. CUPIDICAE💕 18:40, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at User talk:Drmies, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Drmies (talk) 18:53, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Las Cruces Academy moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Las Cruces Academy, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. stwalkerster (talk) 21:07, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Las Cruces Academy


A tag has been placed on Las Cruces Academy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. ~Styyx Talk? ^-^ 21:50, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

Blanking a page
Blanking a page, as you did at Editor of the Week, could be considered vandalism. Especially as it followed your failed attempt to add your name to this years recipients. An awkward editor on WikiPedia is like a bull in a china shop, prone to doing unintentional mischief. Be more careful. &#8213; Buster7  &#9742;   05:54, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Las Cruces Academy for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Las Cruces Academy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Las Cruces Academy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ~Styyx Talk? ^-^ 16:12, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Shameful Block
I have been blocked for editing my own page! This is shameful and will not be repeated. When unblocked in the next few hours, I will show that I am a useful editor. This is totally unnessessary and taking things to the extreme. Shame on you, and shut up ~Yamla. WikiEditorPublicGood999 (talk) 02:51, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
 * You are welcome to resume editing once the block expires, but if you repeat the edits that lead to your current block, expect the next block to be substantially longer. --Yamla (talk) 09:09, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

What exactly led to my current block anyways? ~Yamla ? I see no reasons why this extreme measure was taken in the first place. Outrageous.
 * You continued to remove the Article for Deletion template from Las Cruces Academy against policy, even though it clearly states you must not do this and even though multiple users correctly reverted your inappropriate removal. --Yamla (talk) 15:06, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

Blocked
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.


 * Hello, WikiEditorPublicGood999,
 * You're not getting off to a good start here at Wikipedia. You are fortunate that this is a short block, I have seen editors who were similarly disruptive, removing speedy deletion and AFD tags from pages, get indefinitely blocked. You can't say comments like "This deletion is unacceptable" when everything being done is according to Wikipedia policy. You would benefit from reading more about Wikipedia's policies because you don't seem to be familiar with the grounds for deletion or what "promotional" is. Please educate yourself more so you can get up-to-speed because you are doing disruptive actions that will have consequences. If you continue after your block is over, the next block will be substantially longer.


 * One resources you might use is taking any questions you have about editing on Wikipedia to the Teahouse. There are experienced editors there who can explain decisions that seem to frustrate you, they are there to help you navigate through the many policies that govern this project. I encourage you to give it a try. Liz Read! Talk! 01:56, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Las Cruces Academy has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Las Cruces Academy. Thanks! Grand&#39;mere Eugene (talk) 20:34, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Las Cruces Academy


A tag has been placed on Draft:Las Cruces Academy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Grand&#39;mere Eugene (talk) 18:00, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Arrowhead Park Early College High School and Medical Academy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Las Cruces. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 7 August 2022 (UTC)