User talk:WikiFan11427

August 2017
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Stefan Molyneux has been reverted. Your edit here to Stefan Molyneux was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1kdnmT_7gLE) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 14:42, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Stefan Molyneux
Hi WikiFan, you can't link to webpages that are used in part to sell books. Please don't do that again. Thanks. -- Somedifferentstuff (talk) 17:45, 3 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your comment. Please clarify what you mean.  What Wikiarticle are you referring to?  Also, it is important to provide references for all content to ensure the content is accurate and verifiable.


 * For books, it is sometimes difficult to find online references other than Amazon.com or the author's website. Obviously, a poor reference is better than no reference.


 * Do you have any suggestions regarding where to find 'better' references than the ones I am using.


 * Your comments are welcome and appreciated. WikiFan11427 (talk) 17:52, 3 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Ooops. I just notices the title of your comment.  Please disregarding my question about what article.  What references would you like me to use?  WikiFan11427 (talk) 17:57, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Books are different, just give the ISBN# and year published, you don't need a live link. -- Somedifferentstuff (talk) 18:09, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the suggestion. Where can I find the ISBM#?  WikiFan11427 (talk) 18:10, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Generally you can find the ISBN# on Google books. Here is an example:  - For this one you would use the ISBN starting with 978. Here is the Wiki article that explains formatting: ISBN -- Somedifferentstuff (talk) 08:53, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Pamela M. Peeke for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pamela M. Peeke is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Pamela M. Peeke until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rathfelder (talk) 15:47, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

May 2018
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Tommy Robinson (activist), it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Bennv3771 (talk) 15:52, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi. I understand you are trying to provide background for readers by citing those other court decisions, but those cases are not directly related to Tommy Robinson, and per WP:OR: "To demonstrate that you are not adding OR, you must be able to cite reliable, published sources that are directly related to the topic of the article, and directly support the material being presented." Bennv3771 (talk) 15:56, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: PQ Group Holdings Inc. (July 30)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lapablo was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:PQ Group Holdings Inc. and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:PQ Group Holdings Inc., click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:PQ_Group_Holdings_Inc. Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Lapablo&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:PQ_Group_Holdings_Inc. reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Lapablo (talk) 08:17, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:PQ Group Holdings Inc.
Hello, WikiFan11427. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:PQ Group Holdings Inc., a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:50, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:PQ Group Holdings Inc.


Hello, WikiFan11427. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "PQ Group Holdings Inc.".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 17:07, 30 July 2021 (UTC)