User talk:WikiFlows

Welcome!
Hello, WikiFlows, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Ian.thomson (talk) 00:28, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

June 2015
Please do not remove information from articles, as you did to Indiggo. Wikipedia is not censored, and content is not removed on the sole grounds of perceived offensiveness. Please discuss this issue on the article's talk page to reach consensus rather than continuing to remove the disputed material. If the content in question involves images, you also have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide the images that you may find offensive. Thank you. Ian.thomson (talk) 00:28, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Sockpuppet investigations/Indiggo77. Thank you. Ian.thomson (talk) 00:28, 1 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Wikipedia does not accept original research based on primary sources. It favors secondary sources which interpret the primary sources for us.  In other words, an editor's understanding of the video is irrelevant -- what matters is how professional sources understood it.  Ian.thomson (talk) 21:40, 1 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Given the long history of sockpuppetry of that page, I went ahead and protected it for three more months. OhNo itsJamie Talk 06:23, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Let me put it this way: Whom should we trust, a generally reliable secondary source or some random Wikipedia editor who says the source got it wrong but can't show a better source to support the claim? Verifiability, not truth has long been a motto of Wikipedia. Huon (talk) 17:12, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Re: your email
You were blocked on both technical and behaviorial evidence. You can try BASC. Max Semenik (talk) 12:49, 15 July 2015 (UTC)