User talk:WikiFootEditor

July 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Erchim FC has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:13, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Erchim FC was changed by WikiFootEditor (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.925377 on 2017-07-12T03:13:00+00:00.

Proposed deletion of Max Lubin
Hello, WikiFootEditor. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Max Lubin, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Max Lubin to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks,

Triptothecottage (talk) 03:46, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Max Lubin


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Max Lubin, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It is unambiguous vandalism or an obvious hoax. (See section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please do not introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia; doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
 * It appears to be about something made up, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 03:54, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Max Lubin


The article Max Lubin has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 14:31, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Max Lubin for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Max Lubin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Max Lubin until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:04, 13 August 2017 (UTC)