User talk:WikiFrances

Edit-warring
Your recent editing history at Cansema shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. MastCell Talk 15:59, 11 September 2012 (UTC)


 * You are still edit warring - please take it to the talk page as advised above - if you continue as you are you will just get blocked from editing. noq (talk) 19:52, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Do not add primary sources to wikipedia, particularly ones about supposed cancer therapy which is infact very harmful and causes premalignant lesions.
Aside from the ethical implications of misleading readers that its a good idea to take some bloodroot to deal with that pesky melanoma, you should not add primary sources to wikipedia anyway. Please see WP:MEDRS for more info on this policy. I invite you to review the above guideline and then repair the damage that has been done to bloodroot. Lesion ( talk ) 23:47, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Also, see WP:UNDUE and WP:COI. Lesion  ( talk ) 23:49, 9 March 2013 (UTC)