User talk:WikiKid100

Nomination of Just Dance Wii 3 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Just Dance Wii 3 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Just Dance Wii 3 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wiiboy829 (talk • contribs) 22:30, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Just Dance Wii 2 (Japan)
Just Dance Wii 2 is the second of the Just Dance Wii series of Japan. It's planned to release in July 2012. The game will show similarities of Just Dance 3.

Speedy deletion nomination of Just Dance Wii 2


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Just Dance Wii 2, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Theopolisme  TALK 17:11, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

February 2015
Hello, I'm Dcbanners. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to K.C. Undercover because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Dcbanners (talk) 21:30, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Nowhere Boys
Please do not add or change content, as you did to Nowhere Boys, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Lesahna01 (talk) 00:05, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Nowhere Boys. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Lesahna01 (talk) 22:20, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

January 2016
Greetings. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to List of The Haves and the Have Nots (TV series) episodes, contributed colours that were not WCAG AAA Compliant, causing problems for users that have accessibility issues, which must be reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about this at WP:COLOR and Template talk:Infobox television season, which provide further information about contributing compliant colours to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Alex&#124;The&#124;Whovian ? 05:33, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

September 2016
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Too Close to Home (TV series) into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. ''

Also, the fact that the show was renewed for a second season is not enough to split the episode list article (an exception may be made for splitting early if there are a lot of episodes in the first season, but that's not the case here). You should wait until at least one episode has been announced with a title and an exact scheduled air date. There is no deadline, especially with such a short first season of 8 episodes.'' nyuszika7h (talk) 13:53, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on List of If Loving You Is Wrong episodes. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Alex&#124;The&#124;Whovian ? 03:16, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.