User talk:WikiLawEdits

Speedy deletion nomination of J.P. Cooke Company
Hello WikiLawEdits,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged J.P. Cooke Company for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Trivialist (talk) 18:58, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

Minor and otherwise
I note that you recently added some information (see diff) to the David Domina article. There's nothing wrong with the material that you added; but I'm afraid that you committed an unintentional solecism in marking it as a minor edit.

The use of the minor-edit tag is described at WP:MINOR. In particular, any edit that changes the content of an article is not supposed to be labelled as minor, even if the content change seems like one with which no reasonable person would disagree.

I see that you're a new editor, with a very short contribution history to date, so naturally can't be expected to know all the ins and outs of Wikipolicy. Just calling this to your attention so that you won't make the same mistake again. — Ammodramus (talk) 20:31, 16 February 2015 (UTC)