User talk:WikiLeon/Archive10

SF Meetup #7
You received this invite because you added your name to the Invite list. If you don't wish to be invited any more, simply remove your name. Thanks. -- Shakata Ga Nai ^_^ 06:01, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Chat about Wiki?
Hi there WikiLeon,

I'm a graduate student at Stanford and was wondering if you'd have the time to chat with me (over IM or phone would be fine) about your role as a WP admin. We're researching tools for making WP admins' roles easier and would love to hear your opinion. Let me know if you'd be available sometime in the next week. Thanks so much! Zeppomedio (talk) 18:17, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Sarah Austin
Good fix! Pepso2 (talk) 11:19, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject San Francisco Bay Area roll call
Hello from WikiProject San Francisco Bay Area!

As part of a recent update to our project main page we are conducting a roll call to check which members are still active and interested in working on bay area related content. If you are still interested in participating, simply move your username from the inactive section of the participant list to the active section. I hope you will find the redesigned project pages helpful, and I wanted to welcome you back to the project. If you want you can take a look at the newly redesigned:


 * Crystal Clear app Community Help.png Page
 * Crystal Clear app Login Manager.png page
 * Broom icon.svgup listing
 * Template icon.svgate list

As well as the existing pages:
 * Crystal Clear app clean.pngsment
 * Crystal Clear app kedit.pngle Worklist
 * Crystal Clear app kdict.pnglist
 * Crystal Clear action editdelete.png Deletion sorting (California)

If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask at the project talk page, and add it to your watchlist, if it isn't already.

Again, hi! -Optigan13 (talk) 07:46, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

Eli Soriano
Hi! I know that WP:WL is an essay and violating any of its points is not vandalism. I cited the person for vandalism due to removing contents without seeking concensus on the talk page. If you will go to the user's talk page you will see that I warned him for his drastic and POV removing of contents, which is vandalism. I mentioned that he was exemplifying points 2, 3 and 4 of WP:WL on the edit summaries because that is exactly what he's doing. He is using technicality for obvious cover-up.

The criminal charges should really be given weight because, unlike other religious leaders facing court cases, Eli Soriano was a fugitive for two years who fled the country and went into hiding after being issued a hold departure order and being put in the immigration watchlist (he only surrendered and filed bail last June). If you will look at the articles about religious leaders who gained notability due to their highly-publicized criminal activities (such as Warren Jeffs) you will notice that much weight is placed on the crimes and how they were depicted in the tri-media.

Can you please re-integrate bits and pieces of the newspaper article in the Rape Case section so that researchers who consult the article would get a clear picture of what he was indicted for?

Thank you. - Shannon Rose (talk) 12:08, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

i attend
and if u wanna source, go to fairfield high —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gumaddiction707 (talk • contribs) 03:52, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

i attend
and if u wanna source, go to fairfield high Gumaddiction707 (talk) 03:54, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Motto of the day
Hello, I notice you're using one of the motd templates, run by Motto of the day. You may have noticed that some of the mottos recently have been followed by a date from 2006, or on occasion simply "Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia". The reason for this is that Motto of the day is in some very serious need of help. Participation in the project, which has never been especially high, has dropped considerably over this past summer, to the point we have had several days where no motto was scheduled to appear at all. Over the past several weeks, I've been the only editor scheduling mottos at all, but there aren't enough comments on some of these mottos to justify their use. If we do not get some help - and soon - your daily mottos will stop. In order for us to continue updating these templates for you, we need your help.

When you get a chance between your normal editing, could you stop by our nominations page and leave a few comments on some of the mottos there, especially those that do not have any comments yet? This works very simply; you read a motto, decide whether or not you like it, and post your opinion just below the motto. That's it - no experience required, just an idea of what you personally like and what you feel reflects Wikipedia and its community. If you do have past experience with the project, then please close some of the older nominations once they've got a decent consensus going. There are directions on the nominations page on how to do this.

If you have any questions, please let me know, or post on the project's talk page. I'm looking forward to reading your comments on the suggested mottos, and any additional suggestions you'd like to make. Until then, happy editing! Hers fold  (t/a/c) 02:55, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Hey Leon
Been a while... but check out User:ThreeMIKO--Ironbrew (talk) 11:52, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

USRD Newsletter, Issue 6 (FINAL ISSUE)

 * —Rschen7754bot (talk) 03:56, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:KBWB.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:KBWB.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 03:14, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

Criticism of the Latter Day Saint movement
I have reverted your good faith edit - it is the curse of Ham, not Him. Best, A Sniper (talk) 19:03, 9 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Hello. I've just reverted your good faith edit to Articles of Faith (Latter Day Saints) - the citation isn't necessary as the article merely documents the original Wentworth articles, which is cited, and the changes the Mormon church subsequently made, which is also cited. The additional references merely bolster what is already evident. Best, A Sniper (talk) 06:05, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

WP:PORNBIO
As a member of WikiProject Pornography, I'm just letting you know there's currently a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Pornography about changing the WP:PORNBIO criteria. Your opinions would be appreciated. Thanks. Epbr123 (talk) 15:57, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

User talk:AdonisRouse
Hello. I have noticed you've blocked this user for a month for copyright violations. You may wish to look at their other image uploads, some of which look far to professional to be taken by a *normal* person. Based on the fact a lot of the photos this user uploaded were copyright violations, I think some of these photos are also copy-vios. Thoughts? D.M.N. (talk) 20:54, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I was wondering the same thing after working some at PUI. I am half inclined to simply speedy delete all his uploads. Garion96 (talk) 11:27, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

your image of the internet archive in san francisco's presidio district
hello. i am interested in using the image you took of the internet archive in san francisco for a story we're running in an online magazine. will you please let me know if that would be possible? in order to respond to me, please email me at: avanvechten _AT_ flypmedia (dot) com.

thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.59.45.194 (talk) 18:56, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

Barnstar thanks
Thanks for the barnstar. I am currently accepting Tigers on my user page.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 05:27, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

User:204.38.89.216
Was this an edit conflict, or intentional? I've got no problem with 6 months, but would like to know if my blocks are getting overruled. --barneca (talk) 18:54, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm not arguing the length, just surprised that you'd re-block, substituting your judgement for mine. No harm no foul, I suppose. --barneca (talk) 19:02, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for your good work in the past hour with blocks, especially Cheesytt. I was impressed with your last message on his talk page! He earned it. Regards, Chuckiesdad (talk) 04:56, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:2008 KOFY logo.png)
Thanks for uploading File:2008 KOFY logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:02, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

RE: User_talk:Boswashdevelopment
I have replied at my talk page. Regards, —  Aitias  // discussion 13:47, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

user:Cockermouthcumbria
Heya, I was looking at that unblock request for too, and though the username could theoretically be innocent, it's also a vandalism only account, so I've reblocked. --fvw *  23:39, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
 * There is a big message on his user talk page that says that he's unblocked because of the username. But it says nothing about his vandalism. Could you send him a vandalblocked message as well? --w L &lt;speak&middot;check&gt; 23:42, 12 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Hmm odd, I had put a "and your blocked again" (non-template) text below the granted unblock request, but it wasn't rendering, and the quad-twiddlies of my sig weren't even getting expanded. Some template oddness perhaps? Anyway, I've moved it to the top of the page, thanks. --fvw *  23:57, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Boudoir photography
A tag has been placed on Boudoir photography, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. --Dynaflow  babble  23:49, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

User:User_talk:78.189.22.211
This user keeps vandalizing the Justin.tv page. Can you block this person? Thanks! --Smile up (talk) 21:48, 28 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Can you ban this person again? He's doing the same again: . Thanks. --Smile up (talk) 03:26, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

YTMND wiki
Strange, I decided to stop by the YTMND wiki and I couldn't stay logged in. I could successfully stayed logged on the page stating I had been logged in, but once i navigate away from that page, I log out and have to re-login. I have cookies enabled, I'm not sure what the problem is.. — Moe ε  02:08, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Hmm, I'll try and get back on YTMND wiki soon and try again. Oh, the thing that says 'vandals stop here'? Thats at User:Moe Epsilon/Editnotice and User talk:Moe Epsilon/Editnotice. If you want to create one, just go to your username/Editnotice and add the edit notice template. :) — Moe ε  08:25, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Iglesia ni Cristo work group
There is discussion regarding what if anything to do regarding the Iglesia ni Cristo work group at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Christianity/Iglesia ni Cristo work group. Input from all listed members is more than welcome. Thank you. John Carter (talk) 15:51, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

Iglesia ni Cristo cult vandalsim
I indefinitely blocked the user in question for being a vandalism only account. This user has been warned at least 4 times since he's began editing the article. Save two minor edits, the vandalism is the only thing that this user has done. --w <font color="#00cc00">L &lt;speak&middot;check&gt; 22:05, 10 April 2009 (UTC)


 * I see. I presume it was necessary. I just tried to give a friendly constructive advice, so that he might behave more constructive in the far future when he has matured more. ... said: Rursus (bork²) 17:02, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Dictionary definitions are WP:SYNTH?
Hi,

Can you point me to the WP doc which says Dictionary definitions are WP:SYNTH? Thanks. Conrad940 (talk) 14:06, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

I have three questions
I made an edit today--one edit--to the article Carrie Prejean and have not made an edit to the article in days, but yet another editor reversed my ONE edit and then reported me on the 3RR notice board. I find this to be a clear use of Wikipedia to win a debate about article content and direction. Prejean was called a series of negative things by Perez Hilton, most of the words are contemptuous and vile, such as the b-word and c-word. There are editors that believe that each and every one of Hilton's use of those words MUST be included in the article about Prejean. Now, I don't see the need to have an article about Prejean dominated by the words and comments of ONE individual (highly negative words at that) dominate the life story of Prejean. It is tantamount to having the words of Saddam Hussein concerning George W Bush dominate the Wikipedia article about Bush. It violates Wikipedia avowed goal of NPOV and it violates BLP. Now, I know that consensus in Wikipedia editing is one of the goals, but consensus does NOT override other valid Wikipedia ideals such as BLP. There can be a compromise made where the gist of Hilton's highly negative opinion is included in the article, but at the same time it does NOT dominate the life story of Prejean. Prejean is notable for many, many reasons, not just her public fight with Hilton. She is notable for being a successful model; she is notable for participating in Deal or No Deal; she is notable for being the current Miss California USA; and she is now notable for being a TV personality. My first question is: Can you at least review the article and see if the second, third, fourth, and fifth repetitions of the b-word and c-word violates BLP? I believe that it does. And my second question is: Is it appropriate to make a report on an editor for violating 3RR even though that editor has only made one edit? And my third question is: Is misusing 3RR to win a debate on the proper interpretation of BLP appropriate? I don't think so.--InaMaka (talk) 15:59, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

File:PCT_-_IHTP.ogg
I know, passing the buck and all but I've instead listed the file at Files_for_deletion/2009_May_18. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 19:39, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

Protection of Safety
Can this page be unprotected now? It's been protected for about 18 months. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.1.62.101 (talk) 15:49, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

temple garment
I modified the statement regarding the temple garment in the article on the Church of Jesus Christ of LDS. Take a look. is that agreeable?--Cesevern (talk) 23:53, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Christianity Newsletter - June 2009
thank you wikileon. I will do make better use of the edit summary :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ninja247 (talk • contribs) 09:45, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Christianity Newsletter - July 2009
John Carter (talk) 18:55, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

Motto of the Day
<p style="font-weight:bolder;">Hi there, WikiLeon! Thought you might be interested in Motto of the Day, a collaborative (and totally voluntary) effort by a group of Wikipedians to create original, inspirational mottos. Have a good motto idea? Share it here, comment on some of the mottos there or just pass this message onto your friends.

MOTD Needs Your Help!

Delivered By –p joe f (talk • contribs) 09:26, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Tila Nguyen
I kindly ask you to please join us on the discussion of your attempt to implement WP:IAR. Thank you in advance. --RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 17:14, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Sonic Retro
Template:Sonic Retro has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. WhisperToMe (talk) 03:39, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

Members Church of God International
Hello Admin WikiLeon!

I have reverted your last edit because the English reference does not mention MCGI at all (please check for yourself here it is, it is about Razon launching a record album and his other personal projects, absolutely no mention of MCGI) and the second one is yet to be verified by an NPOV editor who is familiar with the language. As for the smaller edits, they are unsourced. For example, one states that Daniel Veridiano who filed the rape case against Soriano was an "excommunicated member" but there exists no reference (including the news source itself) saying that he was no longer a member when he filed the said case. Including the words "excommunicated member" will mess up the sourced report. The same goes with everything else, like when it says that their regular church services are being led personally by Soriano and Razon, but Soriano is currently out of the country! In fact, has been for a number of years! If you are familiar with the Filipino language maybe you can translate the relevant paragraphs in this news page. I will personally include it in the article. Thanks! – <font face="Edwardian Script ITC" color="blue" size="5">Shannon Rose Talk 14:03, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

Block of user ᜊᜓᜑᜌ᜔ᜆ᜖ (now Buhay Tao)
I'm curious why you blocked this editor. The former username does not violate the username policy, and you provided no notice to the editor that their username had been blocked. Please reply here. Thanks! ··· 日本穣 ? · 投稿  · Talk to Nihonjoe 03:25, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I took it as a confusing username and did not notice at the time of blocking that the non-latin exception has recently been added to policy. I apologize. --<font color="#cc0000">w <font color="#00cc00">L &lt;speak&middot;check&gt; 04:09, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

BTTF Themes
An argument is starting about users who wish to restore an article that was deleted by you 10 months ago. I totally agree that the article should not be restored and ask for your help in this matter. The "Article for deletion" debate is here and the current discussion about restoring it is here. Thanks! -- Lyverbe (talk) 12:32, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Another admin (who, I assume, had the article in his watchlist) took care of it. Sorry for the trouble! -- Lyverbe (talk) 20:39, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

Chris Whitcroft
Why did you delete Chris Whitcroft?--Otterathome (talk) 02:26, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Where is WP:BLP1E located on WP:SPEEDY?--Otterathome (talk) 20:50, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The page you linked seems to go against your rationale for speedy deleting it. If you cannot provide a reason for speedy deleting it, I will recreate it.--Otterathome (talk) 21:03, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I remember providing reliable sources for it, which you shouldn't speedy delete just like that. I think you should restore it.--Otterathome (talk) 21:21, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
 * OK then I will recreate it with reliable sources.--Otterathome (talk) 21:43, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello WikiLeon! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created  are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the list:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 16:46, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) B-Legit -
 * 2) Brendan Moran -

Eli Soriano and Daniel Razon articles
Hi, I have recently nominated the article dedicated to the unnotable Daniel Razon on an AfD but as no knowledgeable person participated, and because a trick was pulled (i.e. a faux RS was dropped and then the pro-keep editor went straight to ANI and reqested a speedy closure during the times that I am usually absent due to time zone differences) the decision of the speedy closure ended up as "keep".

Now, as a result of this tragic event, the same pro-keep editor experienced a high morale boost and, as expected, as soon as he started editing in favor of the subject a Soriano droid came crawling up from the sewers and started making complementary edits specifically adding local award nominations, unnotable awards, blogs and ADD-owned websites as references, and cajoling the said pro-keep editor to obliterate well-sourced information regarding Soriano's rape case etc. Here is a sample edit.

Consider this conversation. Those who have enough experience in dealing with all ADD related articles and familiar with the results of all checkusers that I've requested are fully-aware that this anon, just like all others, cannot be an impartial editor but another follower of the cult with probably dozens of socks. I would just like to give you a heads up on both articles, especially their respective talk pages. Thank you! – <font face="Edwardian Script ITC" color="blue" size="5">Shannon Rose Talk 19:06, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
 * There's enough reliable sources that cover this person as notable here, so the AfD would have been defeated regardless of sockpuppetry. But if you feel that the decision was wrong, you could try to take it to WP:DRV and see what happens --<font color="#cc0000">w <font color="#00cc00">L &lt;speak&middot;check&gt; 08:41, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

SF Meetup #11
This is posted to the groups by request. Please sign up on the Invite list for future announcements. Thanks. -- Shakata Ga Nai ^_^ 23:41, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

April 2010 USRD newsletter

 * — JCbot (talk) 19:18, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:K-Meleon Logo.png
 Thanks for uploading File:K-Meleon Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:39, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Iglesia ni Cristo logo.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Iglesia ni Cristo logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:39, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Iglesia ni Cristo logo.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Iglesia ni Cristo logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:20, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

Summer 2010 USRD newsletter

 * — JCbot (talk) 02:16, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

Interested
I know your on a wikibreak but if when you come back would you be interested on working on the .bt article? Im working on Bhutan related articles but i dont know much about this. Spongie555 (talk) 04:21, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

Fall 2010 USRD newsletter

 * — JCbot (talk) 01:24, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Eve Laurence?
why was the eve laurence page deleted? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.8.215.16 (talk) 11:11, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Please see this page for an explanation. Logan Talk Contributions 07:49, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

Winter 2010 USRD newsletter


JCbot (talk) 01:09, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

U.S. Roads WikiProject Newsletter, Spring 2011

 * —Rschen7754bot (talk) 02:26, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

The Great American Wiknic
Hi there! In the past, you've expressed an interest in local meetups of Wikipedians. Well, here's your chance! On Saturday, June 25, we'll be joining Wikipedians in cities all over the country for the first annual Great American Wiknic -- the picnic that anyone can edit! We'll meet up at a park in SF -- hopefully in the sun -- all other details are still in deliberation!

If this sounds fun, please add your name to the list: Meetup/San Francisco/Wiknic and add that page to your watchlist. (And of course, feel free to edit that page with your ideas, questions, etc.) I look forward to wiknicking with you! -Pete (talk) 23:53, 24 May 2011 (UTC)