User talk:WikiLovesManny29

November 2016
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Vintage Polly Fashion Doll. Jr. Miss Fashion. has been reverted. Your edit here to Vintage Polly Fashion Doll. Jr. Miss Fashion. was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://kenbarbieclones1960s-1990s.weebly.com/ken-competitors-and-barbie-competitors.html) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 03:49, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

WikiLovesManny29, you are invited to the Teahouse!
I was just editing my page of Vintage Polly fashion doll Jr. Miss Fashion. there's no need to delete my page I was just adding information to my page from my knowledge of doll history and other sites from my collector friends that I used with their permission.

so please don't delete my page I worked really hard in designing it for other doll collector to know the history of the Polly fashion doll. [

Hello, I'm XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Vintage Polly Fashion Doll. Jr. Miss Fashion. have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Your edit here to Vintage Polly Fashion Doll. Jr. Miss Fashion. was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://kenbarbieclones1960s-1990s.weebly.com/dollclone-books.html) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 00:19, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Vintage Polly Fashion Doll. Jr. Miss Fashion. for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vintage Polly Fashion Doll. Jr. Miss Fashion. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Vintage Polly Fashion Doll. Jr. Miss Fashion. until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Velella  Velella Talk 00:19, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

my article has very informative information, i don't understand what your talking about?? and my article is about a vintage fashion doll from the 1960s and information is very hard to find. most information I know ids from my doll collecting history and knowledge and I try including a link of a doll book were most collectors and people write blogs about fashion dolls.and vintage dolls ads. I believe this is very unfair and hateful to delete someones page for no reason. there are other doll pages of fashion dolls I don't understand the problem.

Recent edits to Polly Pocket
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Polly Pocket, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 08:40, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Polly (fashion doll) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Polly (fashion doll), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/Polly (fashion doll) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:04, 24 March 2021 (UTC)