User talk:WikiNSK

Welcome to WikiNSK's talk page.

Proposed deletion of OpenInkpot
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article OpenInkpot, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable software, no assertion of notability. 188 Google hits (with livejournal, BlogSpot, twitter and Wordpress excluded), but nothing that approaches significant coverage in reliable independent sources - it's almost all mentions on forums and blogs. 4 news hits, but they are passing mentions rather than significant coverage. Dawn Bard (talk) 15:26, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Dawn Bard (talk) 15:28, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Editing survey
Hi WikiNSK. My name is Mike Lyons and I am a doctoral student at Indiana University. I am conducting research on the writing and editing of high traffic current events articles on Wikipedia. I have noticed that you have been a key contributor at 2008 South Ossetia war. I was hoping you would agree to fill out a brief survey about your experience. This study aims to help expand our thinking about collaborative knowledge production. Believe me I share your likely disdain for surveys but your participation would be immensely helpful in making the study a success. A link to the survey is included below. An explanation of my project is included with the survey.

Link to the survey: http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.aspx?sm=kLMxj8dkk_2bls7yCBmNV7bg_3d_3d

Thanks and best regards, Mike Lyons lyonspen | (talk) 17:34, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Denialism
An article that you have been involved in editing, Denialism, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Unomi (talk) 06:14, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Applied planetology


The article Applied planetology has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * This has been tagged for notability for more than a year. This term is not used in scientific journals and this article content states that it is only a speculative term. No indication of notability found; primarily appearing on WP-related sites.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RJH (talk) 21:42, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of On the curb


The article On the curb has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Dicdef.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 18:46, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of On the curb for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article On the curb is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/On the curb until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 18:43, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Request
Hi, some time ago you participated in the discussion about Czechia, short-form and geographical name of the Czech state. Two weeks ago, I wrote an article about history of the problem with comparison of statements and oppinions from both sides in the dispute, but the article ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Czechia_-_the_name_dispute ) was immediately deleted by some admins. Then, on repeated demands, it was reverted by some rational person and now the voting about deletion of the article (initialized by it erasers) is in process. If you want, help to keep the article, you can vote here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Czechia_-_the_name_dispute#Czechia_-_the_name_dispute Askave (talk) 14:35, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Olivetti M24 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Olivetti M24 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Olivetti M24 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Someone not using his real name (talk) 18:47, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Medical College of Dresden


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Medical College of Dresden requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Epeefleche (talk) 04:40, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Periklis Panagopoulos for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Periklis Panagopoulos is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Periklis Panagopoulos until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wgolf (talk) 05:01, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of When Yellowstone Erupts


The article When Yellowstone Erupts has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No indication of what makes this documentary notable"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gbawden (talk) 11:55, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

Mark WikiProject Linux as inactive?
Hi! I was directed to your talk page by the participants list on  WikiProject Linux. I've started a discussion whether we can keep it running, or mark it as inactive.–  Abuluntu  ( talk 06:11, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

"Waˈpanka" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Waˈpanka. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 13 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 17:42, 13 April 2021 (UTC)