User talk:WikiPerson28828292929

Welcome!
Hi WikiPerson28828292929! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Drmies (talk) 19:18, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

It is obvious, and technical information confirms, that you are (also) User:PoliticalAsianGuy29288282838. Why two accounts? , you placed a DS warning on their talk page related to ARBPIA; I note also that they are active in another troubled area, of race and genetics. Drmies (talk) 19:20, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

It’s my account but I forgot password so I created new one, also what is so troubling about genetics? It’s an interesting field of study, if you think I’m some sort of racial and genetic superiority guy then trust me I am not at all that. WikiPerson28828292929 (talk) 19:24, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Ok, I've copied over the ARBPIA notice. I'd say that although the article Genetic studies on Jews isn't covered by the sanctions you edit would be. But you've reverted it and used the talk page, which is fine. Let someone else make it. Doug Weller talk 15:00, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

You must follow these page-specific restrictions until you have 500 edits and have been here 30 days
For the purposes of editing restrictions in the ARBPIA topic area, the "area of conflict" shall be defined as encompassing

Also, 500/30 Rule: All IP editors, users with fewer than 500 edits, and users with less than 30 days' tenure are prohibited from editing content within the area of conflict. On primary articles, this prohibition is preferably to be enforced by use of extended confirmed protection (ECP) but this is not mandatory. On pages with related content, or on primary articles where ECP is not feasible, the 500/30 Rule may be enforced by other methods, including page protection, reverts, blocks, the use of pending changes, and appropriate edit filters. Reverts made solely to enforce the 500/30 Rule are not considered edit warring.The sole exceptions to this prohibition are:

1. Editors who are not eligible to be extended-confirmed may use the Talk: namespace to post constructive comments and make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive. Talk pages where disruption occurs may be managed by any of the methods noted in paragraph b). This exception does not apply to other internal project discussions such as AfDs, WikiProjects, RfCs, noticeboard discussions, etc.

2. Editors who are not eligible to be extended-confirmed may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by editors who do not meet the criteria is permitted but not required. Doug Weller talk 15:19, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

3. One Revert Restriction (1RR): Each editor is limited to one revert per page per 24 hours on any edits made to content within the area of conflict. Reverts made to enforce the 500/30 Rule are exempt from the provisions of this motion. Also, the normal exemptions apply. Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator.

Note that this means your edits on such pages (which you aren't yet eligible to make) may be reverted by anyone at any time. These restrictions are stricter than those in most other areas because of the problems that we've had in this area. Doug Weller talk 15:19, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

Copying this from your other account PoliticalAsianGuy29288282838. Doug Weller talk 14:56, 26 September 2020 (UTC)