User talk:WikiPolices

Welcome!
Hello, WikiPolices, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Quinton Feldberg (talk) 18:08, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

ClueBot NG is an automated process
You can't tell it to "fuck off"! Quinton Feldberg (talk) 19:05, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
Quinton Feldberg (talk) 23:57, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

@Quinton Feldberg How can I dispute? I just joined, why are anonymous people keep reporting me?WikiPolices (talk) 02:20, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
 * You may dispute the claim at Sockpuppet investigations/PakePakwan under the section titled "comments by other users". Quinton Feldberg (talk) 02:24, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
 * This guide might be useful. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 02:26, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Yea I don't need it anymore. I already am innocent. WikiPolices (talk) 02:29, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
 * The guide explains how to defend yourself against claims. It makes no asssumption of guilt. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 02:31, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

I never said that. Anyways I'm hopeful that I don't need it. I will come out all clean and innocent.WikiPolices (talk) 02:34, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

A beer for you!
Sorry I am not a consumer of alcohol... see religious taboo... thanks for the gratuity.

A cup of covfefe for you!
If it's non-alcoholic.. I will take it gladly. Thanks!WikiPolices (talk) 03:22, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Covefefe... oh dear.. WikiPolices (talk) 03:22, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Please don't take the SPI personally. I filed it in good faith on behalf of an anon who didn't know how to file it himself. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 03:23, 10 August 2017 (UTC)


 * It's alright... I wasn't really scared of the anon.. he's an anon after all. WikiPolices (talk) 03:25, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Yeah, but that doesn't make the diffs look any less suspicious. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 03:27, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Can you tell me which investigation you were referring to in this diff? Because I never saw you open one under this account. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 03:32, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
 * That's why the anon thinks you're a sock. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 03:35, 10 August 2017 (UTC)


 * I tried opening one in Wiki:Sockpuppetry ,but the IP linked was not Valid/unavailable.. WikiPolices (talk) 03:38, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Please provide a diff. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 03:39, 10 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Here's one User:2600:1010:B025:3D25:1599:A07E:22D4:25E WikiPolices (talk) 03:43, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Second one User:2600:1001:B001F:C83A:D482:6614:B99:8BCE WikiPolices (talk) 03:45, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Did you mean 2600:1001:B00F:C83A:D482:6614:B99:8BCE? That's not a diff! We need a diff in order to verify that you added the investigation. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 03:48, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
 * I can't find it in my recent edits... that's the IP addresses I put for the investigation. WikiPolices (talk) 03:50, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Trying to find the investigation. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 03:51, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
 * search by IP address that I put, it was a red link not blue... WikiPolices (talk) 03:53, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
 * But you opened it under this account, right? Quinton Feldberg (talk) 03:55, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

I tried with my account... I don't believe that it opened... it didn't allow me to submit.. WikiPolices (talk) 03:57, 10 August 2017 (UTC) A admin never talked with me.. it wasn't in my recent edits... WikiPolices (talk) 03:59, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
 * I didn't see anything in the filter log but in this diff, you claimed that a "moderator" deleted the investigation. And now you're saying that it didn't even go through at all. Very suspicious! Quinton Feldberg (talk) 04:02, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Well, did you find it? so it didn't go through, so am I right? I thought that I entered correct IP, and someone deleted it... but I don't think that's the case anymore.. WikiPolices (talk) 04:04, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
 * You claimed in that diff that the "moderator" was the sock's "friend". Why did you make that claim, when you had just assumed that the investigation had been deleted, based on the fact that it wasn't there? Quinton Feldberg (talk) 04:07, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

How am really, I supposed know if a mod is personally friends with another mod? Am I some sort of seer or magician? Yes I did felt disappointed that the My investigation didn't go thru/ or got deleted... WikiPolices (talk) 04:10, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Still doesn't explain the second diff. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 04:12, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

I felt biased against... that the Mod has ethnic and Moderator privilege.. YES! i conspired or assumed a little and I don't feel guilty about it (it could be true) since the you can't find the investigation. Is that clear now? WikiPolices (talk) 04:15, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
 * It's ok. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 04:16, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Sorry for the aggressive tone. WikiPolices (talk) 04:17, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
 * What aggressive tone? Quinton Feldberg (talk) 04:18, 10 August 2017 (UTC)


 * The "is that clear now?" That I said. sounded a bit mean in my opinion. WikiPolices (talk) 04:22, 10 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Goodnight, and may the odds be ever in your favor! Quinton Feldberg (talk) 04:36, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Good Night to you as well Sir.. WikiPolices (talk) 04:40, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

August 2017
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/PakePakwan, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Don't overwrite others' contributions on talk pages. Doing it on your SPI looks extremely suspicions. Meters (talk) 06:50, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Sorry it was a mistake.. can you put MY comment back on my SPI? WikiPolices (talk) 06:53, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Done by another editor. Meters (talk) 06:58, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅ Quinton Feldberg (talk) 07:00, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Thanks another editor WikiPolices (talk) 06:59, 10 August 2017 (UTC)