User talk:WikiSentinal

July 2020
Hello WikiSentinal. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:WikiSentinal. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. MrOllie (talk) 14:33, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

July 13, 2020 - Questions regarding Edits & Wikipedia Policy
Hello MrOllie. Thank you for all you do to make sure Wiki subjects are legit.

In response to your questions above, I am not being compensated in any way for my edits so I am in complete compliance with Wikipedia's policy.

I am a junkie over the subject matter who believes that this person qualifies as a "notable" person in multiple categories as defined under Wikipedia's notable people criteria.

Someone can qualify as notable under the "Any Biography" definition when they have "received significant recognized awards and honours." The person is an American lawyer at the top of their field which was documented in the article with valid supporting legitimate references, quotes and links. If you need me to send you all of the links I have found please let me know.

Additionally, the person qualifies under the Wikipedia "Any Biography" criteria as having made a, "widely recognized contribution that is part of an enduring historical record in his or her specific field." This person negotiated the very first online music digital distributions agreements with the American major record labels Universal Music, Sony, Warner Music Group and BMG. This is a substantial accomplishment within the field of law and technology, and it was unprecedented at the time. I didn't even mention that the person is also an author and contributor to HuffPost as well.

You can also qualify the person as notable under the "Creative Professionals" definition. The person is a self-made Hispanic-American software engineer and attorney of Cuban descent that invented, programmed and launched the first online music store on the Internet - the process and technology that later became iTunes. I included multiple recognized media sources for reference confirming of this. Links: https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2011/08/steve-jobs-the-edison-of-our-time-and-the-future-of-apple/244134/ https://www.pri.org/stories/2011-08-25/steve-jobs-resigns-apple-round-smartest-observations-updates

It is for these reasons I believe that the person is "notable" under Wikipedia criteria guidelines and merits its own Wikipedia subject.

Please let me know your thoughts and if you have some suggestions that will improve the submission please send them to me so that I can make edits and resubmit.

Again, thank you and look forward to hearing back! WikiSentinal (talk) 00:23, 14 July 2020 (UTC)WikiSentinal


 * The awards provision of WP:ANYBIO is for very major awards, on the level of an Academy Award. Someone in the legal space who made a historic contribution would be on the level of a supreme court justice or similar. And his music store might be notable (Given the existence of IUMA, it is very debatable that it is the first), but per WP:NOTINHERITED that does not automatically mean he is. Since you are a new editor and this is an article usbject that was previously judged to not be notable and deleted at WP:AFD, you should create it as a draft article and seek review before it goes into the main article space. See WP:AFC for details on this process. - MrOllie (talk) 00:24, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

July 15, 2020 - Questions regarding Edits & Wikipedia Policy
Thank you MrOllie, I will follow your advice. How can I get the draft that I published back since I don't have a backup copy? Can I revert the article, copy it and revert it back to your version? I appreciate your help.


 * Old versions are accessible in the history, for example here. There is no reason to revert. - MrOllie (talk) 17:29, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Ivan Jose Parron
Hello, WikiSentinal. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ivan Jose Parron, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:28, 17 September 2023 (UTC)