User talk:WikiShawnio

ANI Notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. ~ RobTalk 14:57, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

August 2015
Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Talk:Kemi Omololu-Olunloyo— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   00:11, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Oshwah, your choice of communications is confusing and personally I believe it's unnecessary, everyone can do what they want when they chose the way they want to communicate but I can't be chasing you all over the place followings breadcrumbs, can you please address the issues I am having on your talk page as you have done with numerous others in an appropriate manner. I appreciate your contributions and welcome any and all edits, the query has been addressed and I don't have the time right now with school starting to do the lock and chase thing. thank you. WikiShawnio (talk) 01:07, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Oshwah Wikishawnio has a long history of stalking Kemi Omololu-Olunloyo and was arrested April 2011. He consistently harrased her online on every social media platform and libels and slanders her. I was briefed by Toronto Police in a lenghty email. he cant even deny it. The COI tag was put up because of him. Wikicohen (talk) 12:20, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

wikicohen, you are masquerading as someone who is not kemi olunloyo but you seem to be privvy to every facet of her personal life, don't you think it's starting to look a little obvious, we got a person here (you) saying that she was briefed by toronto police on the arrest of a certain individual? that makes no sense at all, if you are not the victim of the crimes you are alleging why in the world would the police be "briefed" you on other victims incidents, you make no sense and I am satisfied now the moderators can see what is going on now and I will no longer press this matter any further, it's kind of ridiculous now. WikiShawnio (talk) 15:09, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

User page
Your user page at User:WikiShawnio was created by. If you do not wish to have a user page, which is completely acceptable, you can request it to be deleted by adding the text to the page. ~ RobTalk 12:20, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Hey Rob, he doesn't have to have a user page? Doesn't that make him a troll? Wikicohen (talk) 12:22, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
 * No, and I recommend you strike that personal attack. No editor is required to have a user page. ~ RobTalk 12:23, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Wikicohen now you are following me to my talk page and making more allegations. you need to stop pls, thank you. WikiShawnio (talk) 14:48, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

August 2015
Your recent editing history at Kemi Omololu-Olunloyo shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ~ RobTalk 22:55, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

I appreciate your feedback Rob, thanks for the heads up. I/O (talk) 22:59, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
 * No problem. I'm not insinuating you're in the wrong in this dispute. I'd recommend using the methods of dispute resolution to proceed, as I doubt the other editor is going to make a good faith attempt to discuss. ~ RobTalk 23:01, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Unblock request



 * The attempted outing by Wikicohen has been previously ignored when I reported it to the oversight email, but now that WikiShawnio is clearly acknowledging that he considers the use of his full name outing, that should be considered. See . That is not the only example. ~ RobTalk 14:18, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

you been great Rob, I can see why and where perfect is coming from. I can let all this cool down and I can stop editing a page, I don't think a indef block was appropriate, I was practically defending myself every day, also perfect made a reference to information online that we had a past, did you read that whole slam page perfect it also says I rape my family and killed other people from my actions, just want to give you a heads up, thanks for absorbing the worst possible reasons online to block me. never mind the back and forth between me and wikicohen, I am sure you took all of that into account first right,...sigh I/O (talk) 14:35, 30 August 2015 (UTC)