User talk:WikiTrueHistory

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content (particularly if you change facts and please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. OhNo itsJamie  Talk 02:08, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

February 2010
Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Religious and spiritual use of cannabis, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Sikh- History 18:28, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Religious and spiritual use of cannabis, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Sikh- History 22:18, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Islam and Sikhism, you will be blocked from editing. Sikh- History 22:19, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Re: Sukhnindian
Please get a reference and the add the paragraph you wish to add. Thanks --Sikh- History 10:10, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

This is the final warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Islam and Sikhism. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Sikh- History 10:13, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for your referenced contributions to Jhatka, but the web site links do not exist, so please could you add new references, or repair the website links. Best Wishes --Sikh- History 18:42, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

Falsely licensed images
Inserting other people's work into Wikipedia without permission or attribution is unacceptable. Copyright infringement and plagiarism pose serious moral, legal, and reputation problems. Remember: Users who upload content (File:Sikhwoman.jpg) with false license declarations ... may be blocked. feydey (talk) 23:31, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Baba-deep-singh-by-bhagat-singh2.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Baba-deep-singh-by-bhagat-singh2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 23:02, 4 March 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fred the Oyster (talk) 23:02, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Sikhsoldiersandkida.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sikhsoldiersandkida.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 23:54, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Sikhbritishpic.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sikhbritishpic.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 23:54, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:France marchofsikhs.JPG
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:France marchofsikhs.JPG, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 23:54, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:RanjitSingh closeup head2.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:RanjitSingh closeup head2.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 23:55, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Sikhsofthejj.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sikhsofthejj.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 23:56, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Jathaofsikhs.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Jathaofsikhs.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 23:56, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Nihangs Prep Bhangi.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Nihangs Prep Bhangi.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 23:57, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

March 2010
You have been temporarily blocked from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text  below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Cirt (talk) 00:13, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

File:Sikhs of punjab in punjab.jpg missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Sikhs of punjab in punjab.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. feydey (talk) 11:39, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Blocked
for. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. feydey (talk) 11:42, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sikh gangs


The article Sikh gangs has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Poor References and Makes no sense

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sikh- History 21:34, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Ksjohal trail.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Ksjohal trail.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 15:36, 12 August 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. dave pape (talk) 15:36, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:KulvinderJohal Boliyan.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:KulvinderJohal Boliyan.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 15:37, 12 August 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. dave pape (talk) 15:37, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kulvinder Singh Johal


The article Kulvinder Singh Johal has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Epbr123 (talk) 22:44, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sikh gangs


The article Sikh gangs has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Empty

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Editor2020 (talk) 23:51, 15 January 2011 (UTC)