User talk:WikiUser99990

Welcome!
Hello, WikiUser99990, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to Revocation of the special status of Jammu and Kashmir does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Questions page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Kautilya3 (talk) 20:48, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

August 2020
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Junagadh has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:54, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Junagadh was changed by WikiUser99990 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.892302 on 2020-08-06T15:54:20+00:00

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Junagadh. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 15:58, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

I don't think my edits were violating any single policy of Wikipedia. In case you want to construct a narrative based on the bribery paid to you then it's completely okay. Any unilateral changes to important articles must be avoided. I thought Wikipedia allows authentic sharing of knowledge but it looks Wikipedia content is full of unauthorized articles. I would request people and my friends to not use this unauthentic platform anymore. WikiUser99990 (talk) 16:05, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

WikiUser99990, you are invited to the Teahouse!
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Junagadh, you may be blocked from editing. — Blablubbs (talk • contribs) 16:03, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Junagadh. Serols (talk) 16:04, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 17:03, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

Who cares? How long will you promote this platform when it's constantly publishing fake and inauthentic information. I would urge people not to use Wikipedia. WikiUser99990 (talk) 17:06, 6 August 2020 (UTC)