User talk:WikiVolunteer

Discussion regarding Aashram edit
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Aashram has been reverted. Your edit here to Aashram was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://m.facebook.com/PrakashJhaProductions/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 08:14, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

Discussion regarding Akhand Bharat edit
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Akhand Bharat. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Panda619 (talk) 02:06, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

Please don't revert the entire edit of an editor without proper knowledge and verifying the information. As per guidelines, I have removed the relevant infobox content. Apart from that, the edit also contained useful corrections of spelling, spacing, links and citations that helps in the improvement of the article. I have added the necessary information back to the page. I hope you will not try to get it undone as this will certainly constitute vandalism. WikiVolunteer (talk) 13:56, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

103.249.233.86 (talk) 14:50, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

April 2022
Your edit to Tehsildar has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. — DaxServer (t · m · c) 08:37, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

Tehsildar
Hello, it appears you have been on Wikipedia for less than two years. I have been active on this platform for close to fifteen years now. During this time, I have created 82 original articles that are still active, and I have done close to 41,000 edits. My work here, though it hasn't always been of the highest quality and oftentimes I have made mistakes, has always been done in good faith. My intention is to make this platform better by contributing to it, and I continually strive to live up to that standard. Now here you come along, a 2-year-old upstart, and you leave a message on my talk page accusing me of not adding meaningful information to Wikipedia. This is not only brazen, it is arrogant and rude. You have already been reprimanded by another user over your edits to the Tehsildar page. I have reverted you a couple of times, not because I have an issue with you or because I wish to lower the quality of that article, but because I didn't think the content you were adding was of high quality. You may certainly disagree with my actions, and that is what the talk page is for. Instead, you have chosen to revert, and to leave an angry message on my talk page. This is not the way to go, and it is certainly not the way to start your Wikipedia career. My advice to you is to stay humble, do good work, accept the feedback of more experienced editors as much as possible, and if you can avoid it, try not pissing other people off; you never know when you'll need the support of other editors. Wikipedia isn't an island, it's a village. When someone reverts your edit, it isn't personal, so don't take it that way. Be professional. Don't take article-related issues to user pages but instead, discuss on the article page. All the best. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 01:10, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

9812288323
mubin 223.188.255.134 (talk) 14:19, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

Mubin
khan 223.188.255.134 (talk) 14:20, 16 March 2023 (UTC)