User talk:Wiki Gary

Speedy deletion nomination of JanusLogix
Hello Wiki Gary,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged JanusLogix for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Fbdave (talk) 22:29, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

June 2017
Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Talk:JanusLogix. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:31, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of JanusLogix


A tag has been placed on JanusLogix requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Malunrenta (talk) 21:29, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Why?
I am curious as to why you have recreated an article that was speedy deleted last night, for reasons explained in detail on my talk page. Further I cautioned against recreating it in anything close to the form it was in at the time deletion. Your recreation of an article that does not meet our standards for inclusion after all of the above does not seem to be showing much respect for the community or our guidelines. If I'm missing something here feel free to explain. -Ad Orientem (talk) 21:42, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Why didn't you answer me and give me a good reason for deleting the page?
As I have explained that there are several other company's listed on the Canopy Group page with associated links. Did you bother to look it up before deleting it. NO you didn't! I certainly can't understand why you would delete a page for no apparent reason. My God, it's a simple page. There is no reason to delete it, none whatsoever! If you want to delete it, then by God delete all the other companies pages as well. It makes NO sense. You have an obligation to explain your reasons. I am a pretty understandable person. If you make a good case than I'll have to agree.
 * I have explained the reasons, in detail. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. We have guidelines on what is and is not acceptable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. You seem to be under the impression we are trying to hound you or your articles, which is inaccurate. All that is going on is that we are trying to ensure that Wikipedia remains a real encyclopedia, with standards and guidelines agreed on by the community being upheld. For now I have moved your article to a user subpage to allow you to work on it w/o risk of it being summarily deleted. Please read WP:YFA, WP:N, WP:GNG WP:NCORP, WP:RS and WP:OR. These should help you avoid this and potentially other problems in the future. If you need any help or guidance I am more than happy to give pointers. -Ad Orientem (talk) 22:14, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: JanusLogix (June 13)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Legacypac was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:WikiGary/JanusLogix and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Legacypac (talk) 03:25, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Wiki Gary (talk) 17:46, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, User:WikiGary/JanusLogix


Hello, Wiki Gary. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "JanusLogix".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 12:25, 19 December 2017 (UTC)