User talk:Wiki Raja/Archive 9

Re: your image concerns
Thanks for being patient, I've been on an urgently needed WikiBreak. As to reply to your question, the are two "breeds" of images on WIkipedia, free ones (please, please upload them to Commons), and fair use ones. This page should explain all you need to know. Yours truly,  Maxim (talk)  20:06, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Hi
Hi WikiRaja. I dont really know yet how to set up the email. N im not really free these days. So for the meantime u could just leave a msg at my talk page of any updates. Cheers.. kawaputra torque 09:38, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

From Daya Anjali
Hello wiki raja, no such specific interest. i only edit the subject which i know. Mallayudh was there all over the india even described in Both hindu epics. the word itself are sanskrit words. so i redirected to the article with more details. you can go ahead and add there which is spcific to Tamil nadu. also varma kali and varma kalri are one and the same. and word asaan is not a tamil or malayalam word, but derived from sanskrit word acharya means master. i think we can merge this artcle. also please dont include content from tamilnation websites because it may not an authentica one. i have removed the word tamil in some artcle because whatever its used in malayalam is applicable to tamil also, but more common in kerala. for example asaan, this word is used a surname by communities in kerala, who were teachers, kalari trainers, astrologers, poets etc. this was not common in tamil history. I am not here to establish any supremacy of any sect, cast or race. still i do respect rich culture and history of tamil ... Daya Anjali (talk / contribs) 06:50, 11 September 2007 (UTC)


 * That would be a big issue as there are many localised version of malla yudha all over inda. one community of GSB known as mallyas were only into this kind of art in konkan region. Then Mallai gardi of Tulunadu and dwanda yudham of kerala etc. its tedious to create and maintain each and every artcile with same concept and background. All these names including Mallayodham in TN are just a localised name of an art which is prevailed all over indian continnent.

Daya Anjali (talk / contribs) 06:01, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, since both Malyutham and Mallayuddha were created, it would be a better idea to leave those pages be and instead put "See Also Mallayuddha" on the Malyutham page, and a "See Also Mallyutham" on the Mallayuddha page. In that way the peoples efforts to create both pages does not go to waste, but at the same time the reader would be able to read about the other wrestling styles by going to the See Also section. Regards. Wiki Raja 06:06, 12 September 2007 (UTC)


 * thanks for the welcomeing for the project. when i have time and knowledge of the subjuct, i will definetly contribute. thanks again

Daya Anjali (talk / contribs) 06:03, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Hi friend
Hi Friend,

The following edit was made by me,

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kannada_language&oldid=156874538

I also posted regarding my edit in the discussion page,

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Kannada_language

but some one removed it calling it as a vandalism... why cant you support my cause...

Regards —Preceding unsigned comment added by 164.164.96.190 (talk) 10:23, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Image:Tamilakkam_map.JPG listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Tamilakkam_map.JPG, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —  pd_THOR  undefined | 09:45, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Checkuser
Your bad faith check user case has been summarily rejected here. In future, do some background work to really find out if there is such a case and whether the case will stand. Unnecessarily, pulling my name for a check user in future and hence maligning my name will not be taken lightly. Thanks -- ¿Amar៛ Talk to me / My edits 02:08, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Warning
Wiki Raja: With reference to this case put forward by you, I would like to warn you that, if you continue do such bad faith cases it will have to be considered as personal attack. Please go through WP:SOCK page to understand better what does a sockpuppet mean. Also, I request you to read the Checkuser's comment and understand it carefully. . RFCU is for accounts that legitimately look like there is a single operators, not for listing people you disagree with. Hope this will be your last bad-faith case. If you do not stop, I will have to bring such actions into some admin attention. Thanks - KNM Talk 02:15, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

fantasy man
For a person who lives in a fantasy world of non-existant civilizations, You do have a sense of humor. Keep it upDineshkannambadi 02:30, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Do your research
Just because I frequent WP:RFPP does not mean I am an administrator. Next time, please do some research into the users you're talking to if the situation requires someone with special buttons. - Jéské  ( v^_^v Kacheek! ) 04:35, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Contradiction
You claim here that your project WikiProject_Dravidian_civilizations constitutes a bigger part of the geography. But your edits here are biased to Tamil Nadu and Sri Lanka (70% of the edits belong to that). Don't tell me that you did not have any news on any other part of the geography. So far starters, you may first want to convince yourself on what is the whole project all about and then convince others. -- ¿Amar៛ Talk to me / My edits 04:43, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Please stop spamming your complaints everywhere
While I appreciate that you may currently be in a difficult position, please cease spamming this wherever you can. This is unlikely to earn you extra support for your claims, and will likely turn more people against you. You've made your point, now wait for it to be acted upon. Regards ~ Riana ⁂ 04:47, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Wiki Raja, you don't seem to understand the CU policy. Just because someone removed your banners for a wikipedia project doesn't mean that everyone is a sockpuppet. Preforming a CU is the last level in finding socks, because the CU has access to private information which could affect the privacy of some users. Instead of doing a CU on each of the people who removed your banner, ask them each why they did this on their respective talk pages. Now, you are canvassing in order for BG, and DMCdevit to be "desyopsed" or "dearbitrated" or "decheckusered". This is being disruptive and further disruption can cause a block.  Mi r a n da   18:04, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Scripts
Kannadigas and everyone else got their scripts from Brahmi. Sarvagnya 07:31, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * I have told you before, to stop vandalizing my talk page. Wiki Raja 19:01, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Hi wikiraja
hi wikiraja

happy to meet you... My edits being continously attacked by kannada editors lets work together... to solve this regards --IndiWorld 10:26, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

"Abuse of admin powers"
Declining to do a checkuser because it goes against the privacy policy is not admin abuse. I strongly urge you to drop the matter right away, but if you insist on carrying on, do not call it abuse of power.  Ry an P os tl et hw ai te  18:10, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Then what do I call it? Wiki Raja 18:11, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * I'd call it a check user doing an excellent job by declining to run a check that went against the wikimedia foundations privacy policy.  Ry an P os tl et hw ai te  18:15, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Ryan, thats an excellent answer! Thank you.
 * Wiki Raja, I had request you to read and understand carefully, the comments given by the checkuser admin, which said "RFCU is for accounts that legitimately look like there is a single operators, not for listing people you disagree with." I'm afraid, you still don't seem to have understood. Please remember, if Checkuser is used for all such cases where differing parties filing RFCU, then literally there would be thousands of cases everyday. Rejecting such cases is certainly an excellent job, and is by no way an "Abuse of admin powers". Please stop this canvassing against admins, and involve in healthy contributions towards improving Wikipedia. Thanks - KNM Talk 18:30, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * KNM, stop vanadalizing my talk page with your trash. Wiki Raja 19:00, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

South India Musical Instrument.
Hi WikiRaja, Ive created a new page for South Indian Musical instrument Urumee & Udukai. Not sure whether it will be part of Dravidian Heritage or not. Pls advise. Should i attach it together under Dravidian category.

Your advise is appreciated. :)

Rgds, Shri a.k.a Killerserv --killerserv 03:22, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Of course, go ahead and attach it together under Dravidian category. It is a part of Dravidian heritage of the Tamils of both Southern India and Sri Lanka. Good job on the articles. Wiki Raja 03:49, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

Tamil Bell
Hello Wiki Raja, thanks for your email, I thought I could answer here just as well. Very little is known about the Tamil Bell - its one of those mystery objects that appear out of nowhere, and which become objects of some rather weird theories as a result. Reverend Colenso himself is not regarded as a very reliable source, and he did not give many details about exactly where and when he found the bell or what he knew of its history. There are many ways it could have got to New Zealand by 1836, as there was a lot of contact by that period between New Zealand and the rest of the world. As for the editor on this Wikipedia that you warned me about, I think that people like him perform a good job in pointing out where people might be using sources of dubious quality. Wikipedia needs people to challenge and scrutinise and keep us on our mettle; if we cannot defend our sources then we should not use them. But thanks for your advice. Cheers Kahuroa 21:32, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the reply. I understand that it is good to have constructive criticism. However, this individual has went well beyond that with our articles. Regardless of how many referenced sources along with page numbers we provide for his demands, he continues to blank numerous pages which includes trolling. Furthermore, this individual takes the liberty to specifically target Tamil related articles while pushing his personal POV against Tamil people. Believe me, I am not the only one who has complained about this user several times. Regards. Wiki Raja 22:29, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
 * OK. I hope it can all be sort out amicably then. Cheers. Kahuroa 22:41, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of User:UBX/Anti Indo-fascism
A tag has been placed on User:UBX/Anti Indo-fascism, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD g10.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Sarvagnya 22:07, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Stop vandalizing my userbox, talkpage, and userpage. Wiki Raja 22:23, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

Userbox
Hi - I am afraid even if it was only for your userpage, that userbox isn't acceptable per our policies. The page it links to only says that "some people consider" it to be fascist. If the organisation itself had admitted that it was fascist, that would be different.  E LIMINATOR JR  23:49, 19 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Very well then. Wiki Raja 00:12, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:User SL state sponsored terrorism
A tag has been placed on Template:User SL state sponsored terrorism, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD g10.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Gnanapiti 01:13, 20 September 2007 (UTC)