User talk:Wiki Wistah/Newspaper articles

Starting fresh
Thanks for all your comments, Tobogganoggin, IvoShandor, jtowns, and, of course, the countless millions who saw this page and chose not to comment because they knew I did it perfectly the first time. Or at least that's what I tell myself.

I finally took a minute to incorporate some of your ideas into a second draft (cleverly labeled "2nd draft"). Accordingly, I moved the first draft to an archive (cleverly placed in a subpage called "/d1") and blanked this page so you can tear apart the new version. Have fun, and really, THANK YOU for being part of this. ``` W i k i W i s t a h W a s s a p ``` 04:12, 8 July 2007 (UTC)


 * looks fine to me. jtowns 21:12, 8 July 2007 (UTC)


 * I'd word it that newspaper companies owning more than 2 newspapers in different markets are notable. At least the more in different markets part.. If they bought up both newspapers of a city and continue to publish them then aren't themselves notable. DGG (talk) 23:47, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

Notability section
This section is not secure. There is a new essay being created at the moment, Notability (media), which is attempting to create a consensual guideline to newspaper notability. Input is welcome.  SilkTork  * SilkyTalk 14:51, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

"Wikipedia:NART" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:NART&redirect=no Wikipedia:NART] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Edward-Woodrow :) [ talk ] 23:42, 22 August 2023 (UTC)