User talk:Wiki monitor

Hello, I'm Helpsome. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added, because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Helpsome (talk) 10:33, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Helpsome (talk) 17:57, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Hi Helpsome. I think YOU are a kind of spammer. You removed a link and sent me this message that is a cut-and-paste of a standard message. It seems that you did not even take a deep look of what you did. The page we talking about has no sense without the official report I added in the external links. And aviation-accident dot net is the mai source of official aviation accidents reports in the web. I will be restoring the link I posted until the end of times. Please take time to review your actions and at least take a look of the page and what you are doing, don't just delete and that's it. Thank you.

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Should you attempt to "be restoring the link I posted until the end of times" you will be blocked. Helpsome (talk)

March 2015
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for adding spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Hut 8.5  21:05, 26 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Wikipedia doesn't allow anyone to add any link that someone considers relevant to the topic. We have various rules about what kinds of link are and are not acceptable, and we strongly disapprove of people adding links to sites in order to promote them, or adding links to sites they are associated with. (If you are the webmaster of this site, as implied by the posts above, then that includes you here.) Various people reverted your additions of this link and asked you not to add it again. The right thing to do if you objected to this would be to discuss it with those editors or other people interested in those pages on the article talk page. Instead you put the links back and declared that you would carry on doing so forever. That's why you were blocked.
 * Your block has now expired and you are able to edit Wikipedia again, but I would strongly advise you not to add any more links to this site, at least not unless you have discussed it first with other people who think it's OK. If you do add any more links then you will probably be blocked again, and this block will be longer (and may not have an expiry date at all). Incidentally I did look at the site before I blocked you, and the reason I didn't download any reports is because the site asked for my personal information first. This is one of the reasons why the link wasn't considered appropriate.  Hut 8.5  15:25, 30 March 2015 (UTC)