User talk:Wiki user contr

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Wiki user contr. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Digital display advertising, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 19:09, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

@MrOllie, can you help me understand why my addition is trivial? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wiki user contr (talk • contribs)


 * It is a minor detail. It doesn't belong in the article at all, let alone in the opening section. - MrOllie (talk) 19:35, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

@MrOllie, thank you for sharing your perspective. This seems to me like your individual opinion/feeling rather than an objective assessment based on observable or verifiable facts. Perhaps you can elaborate on why you think is a "minor" detail. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wiki user contr (talk • contribs)


 * It is an inconsequential statistic, supported by a primary source. Wikipedia is supposed to be based on secondary sources. Why are you so insistent that this be included? Are you related to this study or its authors somehow? - MrOllie (talk) 19:49, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

@MrOllie, thanks for your response. It seems to me that you are restating your individual opinion/feeling rather than providing an objective assessment. You are repeating that it is an inconsequential statistic/minor detail without justifying your opinion based on observable or verifiable facts and I don't see how this will help improve the page. If the source is the problem, we can find alternative sources. Would this be a better source https://www.thinkwithgoogle.com/marketing-strategies/video/5-factors-of-viewability/ ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wiki user contr (talk • contribs)


 * Wikipedia maintains history of everything that is said. Do not edit other people's comments to make it appear that they have written things they have not. - MrOllie (talk) 20:11, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

@MrOllie you seem to have assigned malicious intention to an accidental edit.