User talk:Wikiassociate

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the [ reviewer's talk page] . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 14:37, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the [ reviewer's talk page] . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Pol430   talk to me  20:35, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Your submissions to Articles for Creation
Hi. With comments like these you are not exactly encouraging our hard working volunteers to  respond to your requests. Using capital letters in  the Internet  is considered shouting and rude. Please understand that like you, we are all volunteers here and all have one goal: to make Wkipedia a quality encyclopedia. Happy editing, and if you need any  help, don't hesitate to ask at the Teahouse (see above). Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 07:02, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

January 2013
Hello, Wikiassociate. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Talk:Chennai Express, you may need to consider our guidance on conflicts of interest.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:28, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the [ reviewer's talk page] . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia!  Pr at yya  (Hello!) 13:52, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or  located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 15:00, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Warning
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. -- Gurubrahma (talk) 14:28, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Hello, Wikiassociate. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sainath Dukkipati, you may need to consider our guidance on conflicts of interest.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.  If this picture was taken by you then you should not be creating you own autobiography here, Darkness Shines (talk) 23:56, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Category:Indian child actors
A bit of advice: you can't add articles to a category by adding them to the category description page. Instead, you need to edit the article itself, and add the category there; it will be automatically listed in the category. If Wikipedia doesn't have an article about Sainath Dukkipati, the actor can't be listed in any of the categories, either. (By the way, you have also accidentally removed the interwiki links from the category page, which I have fixed.) - Mike Rosoft (talk) 07:58, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

April 2013
Hello, I'm Psychonaut. Your recent edit to the page Gori Tere Pyaar Mein appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Psychonaut (talk) 18:43, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Gunday. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Psychonaut (talk) 06:36, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Gori Tere Pyaar Mein. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Luke no 94 (tell Luke off here) 08:34, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you add unsourced material (or falsely sourced material) to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ''Additionally, you appear to be editing the same articles while you are logged out, which may be seen as sockpuppeting. If you continue to add unsourced names to these articles, or continue to edit both logged in and out, you will be blocked for disruptive editing. '' This should be seen as a final warning. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 13:45, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sainath Dukkipati
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sainath Dukkipati, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sainath Dukkipati and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sainath Dukkipati during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Psychonaut (talk) 13:13, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

ANI discussion
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. —Psychonaut (talk) 14:48, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Writ Keeper &#9863;&#9812; 15:12, 30 April 2013 (UTC)