User talk:Wikiauditor7

April 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. However, I noticed that your username (Wikiauditor7) may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because Username is misleading and lends an unearned impression of authority. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username, or you may simply create a new account and use that for editing. Thank you. &#124; Uncle Milty  &#124;  talk  &#124;  22:07, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Jim Evans has been reverted, as it removed all content from the page without explanation. Please do not do this, as it is considered vandalism; use the sandbox for testing. If you think the page should be deleted, see here for what to do. Thank you. Skarebo (talk) 00:38, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Jim Evans declined
Your nomination of this article for speedy deletion said ''not properly sourced. jim evans the umpire is not important enough for a wikipedia article. source link used to promote business. not written from an unbiased view.'' None of these are considered valid reasons for speedy deletion. What are considered valid reasons for speedy deletion are listed at Criteria for speedy deletion. Note also that other deletion processes such as proposed deletion and articles for deletion have a much broader scope than the deliberately narrow reasons for speedy deletion. Beeblebrox (talk) 07:59, 4 April 2011 (UTC)