User talk:Wikiazeus

Speedy deletion nomination of Nabi Mammadov


Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Nabi Mammadov, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Dora the Axe-plorer (talk) 11:42, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nabi Mammadov (May 17)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nabi Mammadov and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nabi Mammadov, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Nabi_Mammadov Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Robert_McClenon&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Nabi_Mammadov reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 14:55, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Nabi Mammadov for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nabi Mammadov is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Nabi Mammadov until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:24, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

COI Message
Hello, Wikiazeus. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Nabi Mammadov, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. CommanderWaterford (talk) 16:34, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

May 2021
Hello, I'm CommanderWaterford. I noticed that you recently removed content from Nabi Mammadov without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please do not remove COI Template again without seeking consensus of the articles talk page. CommanderWaterford (talk) 19:39, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Nabi Mammadov shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. CommanderWaterford (talk) 20:03, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nabi Mammadov ‎. -bɜ:ʳkənhɪmez (User/say hi!) 20:49, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi Wikiazeus! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. RegentsPark (comment) 01:16, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Image used at Nabi Mammadov
Please be so kind to explain why do you marked all of the photos used at this article as "own work" - at the same time you want to tell us that you do not have a Conflict of Interest. Either you violated the Copyright of those Images or you have a clear Conflict of Interest. CommanderWaterford (talk) 20:05, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

Minor edits and behavior in AfD discussions
First, a minor edit is when you are only doing something that does not change the meaning of something at all or add/remove any significant content. This could be fixing a typo, adding a "the" that's forgotten, adding one forgotten word, removing a duplicate word, etc. It is not every edit you've been marking as minor. Please stop using the minor edit checkbox when you are not doing a minor edit, and please use the preview tool to ensure as best you can your comments are complete before you submit the edit. Making multiple follow up minor edits increases the risk you cause edit conflicts with people trying to respond to you after you post the comment.

Furthermore, you should not add multiple "bolded votes" in a discussion to an AfD. First of all, discussions on Wikipedia aren't votes - they are based on the arguments presented, so even if you add 100 "bold keeps", it won't matter if you don't add substance. You also should not add more than one bolded word to a specific discussion - it makes it very hard to see how many different editors have participated.

Lastly, do not edit other user's comments to change their reading. Editing other users' comments is extremely limited in when it is acceptable to do so - and your recent editing of User:Celestina007's comment is completely inappropriate behavior. Repeating this sort of behavior is likely to result in you being blocked from editing that discussion, if not from Wikipedia entirely. -bɜ:ʳkənhɪmez (User/say hi!) 05:22, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

I've fixed your comments in that discussion this time. Please take note of these recommendations for the future. Thanks -bɜ:ʳkənhɪmez (User/say hi!) 05:22, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts&#32;per the evidence presented at Sockpuppet investigations/Wikiazeus. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   01:18, 19 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Also, I notice you've posted five unblock requests. If you post another, you'll end up losing talk page access. FYI. --RegentsPark (comment) 17:50, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

Plese contact

 * I sincerely ask you to leave your email address on my talkpage. I need help from a knowledgeable person like you.

May 2021
 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. RegentsPark (comment) 18:58, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

is closed. Check user, so ArbCom. -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 13:11, 17 July 2022 (UTC)