User talk:Wikicallie

Welcome!

 * }

May 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Callie Crossley has been reverted. Your edit here to Callie Crossley was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.thecrushedgrapereport.typepad.com) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 04:09, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:WGBH RADIOnonsmilingCallieCrossley-11-3.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:WGBH RADIOnonsmilingCallieCrossley-11-3.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 00:05, 13 May 2011 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 00:05, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:CallieCrossleynosmile.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:CallieCrossleynosmile.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log].

You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. feydey (talk) 05:57, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

Please refrain from writing autobiographical articles, as you did at Callie Crossley. Creating an article about yourself is strongly discouraged; if you create such an article, it may be deleted. All edits to articles must conform to our policies on no original research, neutral point of view, and avoid conflicts of interest. Please remember that Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia, not a personal webspace provider. If your achievements are verifiable and genuinely notable, and thus suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later. (See Wikipedians with articles.) Thank you. ukexpat (talk) 20:22, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

Sitting next to you
Good heavens, we are learning stuff fast, aren't we?--ReginaWhite (talk) 15:57, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

Are you...?
Question for you: are you Callie Crossley, the person that the Callie Crossley article is about? If so, please take a look at Autobiography and Autobiography when you have a moment. It is generally frowned upon for people to edit articles about themselves directly, even if they did not write the articles themselves. The proper protocol in such a case is to bring up your concerns on the article's talk page, and then let other people edit the article. This is in order to maintain neutrality. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks! SchuminWeb (Talk) 01:26, 6 October 2012 (UTC)