User talk:Wikicanada1127

Brjl1127, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!
 The Adventure

Your recent page creation
Please refrain from creating articles on storms that are clearly non-existent or still in the future. This violates Wikipedia's policies on article content, and it also violates's Wikipedia's rules against introducing content that predicts the future. You can work on articles for precursors/likely developments in your own userspace, under your own username (such as the current title of your draft article after I moved it), with certain restrictions. It's better to wait until a storm actually develops before drafting or creating an article. Please keep this in mind in the future. Thank you, and happy editing!  Light and Dark2000  🌀 (talk) 00:05, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

August 2019
Thank you for your contributions. One of your recent contributions to Tropical Storm Dorian (2019) has been reverted or removed, because it contains speculative or unconfirmed information about a future event. Please only add material about future events if it is verifiable, based on a reliable source. Wyatt2049 &#124; (talk) 11:10, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

January 2020 North American storm complex moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, January 2020 North American storm complex, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @  04:47, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

Early February 2020 North American storm complex
Hi there, in future please do not remove merger tags from articles (as at Early February 2020 North American storm complex) while a discussion is still ongoing – it needs to stay there so people who may be impacted by the change can be quickly directed to the merger discussion. If you have an opinion on the matter please contribute it through the correct channels by stating your point of view at Talk:Storm Ciara – at the moment the discussion is still open so I have re-added the merger tag and you are welcome to contribute to the debate. Many thanks! Buttons0603 (talk) 22:08, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Wikicanada1127

Thank you for creating January 2020 North American storm complex.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 12:31, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

TD-Eleven
Sir, the storm did weaken along with the convection with the pressure rising ever so slightly. Robloxsupersuperhappyface (talk) 14:36, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

Invite!
Hey, I know you edit winter storm articles a lot and it would be great if you could join! Hurricane  Covid  (contribs) 18:52, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Inviting you to WPNTS!
This is my second time inviting you. Please accept, as you have made significant contributions to winter storm articles and it would really help if you could join. Thanks! ~ 🌀 Hurricane Covid 🌀 15:27, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of February 2019 North American winter storm for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article February 2019 North American winter storm is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/February 2019 North American winter storm until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. greyzxq talk 16:58, 29 April 2023 (UTC)