User talk:Wikicfk

When referencing a Salon article on the Mark Driscoll entry you termed the authors perspective as "balanced". I believe a more neutral reference would be "different" and have changed it as such.

The Australian
Stop wasting your time and ours. Many of us have this article on our Watchlists. We will notice any changes pretty quickly, and while I may even agree with some of the sentiment behind your changes, I know that you know that they cannot stay. HiLo48 (talk) 06:24, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

May 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not replace pages with blank content, as you did with this edit to The Australian, as this is confusing to readers. The page's content has been restored for now. If there is a problem with the page, it should be edited or reverted to a previous version if possible; if you think the page should be removed entirely, see further information. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 07:07, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Australian. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: The Australian was changed by Wikicfk (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.951197 on 2012-05-23T08:02:13+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:02, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

December 2012
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wayne LaPierre, you may be blocked from editing. ROG5728 (talk) 08:28, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Wayne LaPierre, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Wayne LaPierre was changed by Wikicfk (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.963564 on 2012-12-15T08:50:42+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:50, 15 December 2012 (UTC) You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Materialscientist (talk) 09:41, 15 December 2012 (UTC)