User talk:Wikidea

Please leave your thoughts and comments here. But please do not leave automated messages.

Your signature
Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated  tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors. Your signature is also causing Tidy bug affecting font tags wrapping links.

You are encouraged to change
 * :  Wik idea 

to
 * :  Wik idea 

—Anomalocaris (talk) 00:35, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you for updating your signature! —Anomalocaris (talk) 09:15, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Ways to improve Russian interference in the 2016 United Kingdom referendum on exiting the European Union
Hi, I'm Slatersteven. Wikidea, thanks for creating Russian interference in the 2016 United Kingdom referendum on exiting the European Union!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This really needs a lot of work top be a stand alone article. At this time it really is little more then a collection of random opinions.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Slatersteven (talk) 15:04, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Russian interference in the 2016 United Kingdom referendum on exiting the European Union for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Russian interference in the 2016 United Kingdom referendum on exiting the European Union is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Russian interference in the 2016 United Kingdom referendum on exiting the European Union until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — JFG talk 01:56, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Re Conegrade Ltd


The article Re Conegrade Ltd has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No sources, and no indication that this case played any important role in setting precedent."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reyk YO! 08:46, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

A dead link (?) ... or something (on the "User:" page for "Wikidea")
This might not be your department ... maybe it is something external to your user page, that changed, and/OR something that you might not care about ...

anyway, the first entry under User:Wikidea says this:
 * Law category

and it seems to point to the URL "http://www.1911encyclopedia.org/Category:Law". However, there seems to be something wrong with that entire domain name, (www.1911encyclopedia.org). Clicking on that link, gives some kind of an "ERROR MESSAGE" web page (feel free to try it yourself) ... saying -- [in part!] -- something like Server Error in '/' Application.

Runtime Error

Description: An application error occurred on the server. The current custom error settings for this application prevent the details of the application error from being viewed remotely (for security reasons). It could, however, be viewed by browsers running on the local server machine.

Details: To enable the details of this specific error message to be viewable on remote machines, please create a  tag within a "web.config" configuration file located in the root directory of the current web application. This  tag should then have its "mode" attribute set to "Off".

Even trying to enter a Plano vanilla URL of "http://www.1911encyclopedia.org/" (in to my browser "location" window) ... with pretty much nothing but that domain name ... results in some kind of "IOU" -type web page ... which seems to suggest that maybe the web hosting isn't set up [correctly], and/or maybe there is some problem with the domain name registration ... or something.

Just "FYI". Read or Ignore ... --Mike Schwartz (talk) 21:50, 17 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Thanks - will fix!  Wik idea  22:29, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Russia and brexit listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Russia and brexit. Since you had some involvement with the Russia and brexit redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. — JFG talk 00:13, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Treaty establishing the European Community


A tag has been placed on Category:Treaty establishing the European Community requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — swpb T go beyond 16:15, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Re Conegrade Ltd for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Re Conegrade Ltd is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Re Conegrade Ltd until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Reyk YO! 10:47, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

Russian hacking scandal listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Russian hacking scandal. Since you had some involvement with the Russian hacking scandal redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. &thinsp;&mdash; Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)&thinsp; 15:56, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Baldwin
Hi, I reverted this edit of yours because there didn't appear to be a source. I didn't readily find a source myself but pinging you in case you have one so we can reinstate the material. Marquardtika (talk) 15:35, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Restored, added ref. -- SarekOfVulcan (talk) 15:41, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks.  Wik idea  17:20, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Adams and others v Cape Industries plc & another listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Adams and others v Cape Industries plc &. Since you had some involvement with the Adams and others v Cape Industries plc & another redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 20:48, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

Diversity clause listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Diversity clause. Since you had some involvement with the Diversity clause redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 03:29, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

Inquiring about sources of information on UK EPL
Hi there. I came across your informative articles on employment protection legislation in the UK. I'm writing my dissertation on the development of EPL in the UK from the 1950 to the present period. I'd like to pick your brain about a few things. Could you please email me at ferdosi@bell.net

Bristol Energy moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Bristol Energy, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 19:16, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
 * What a waste of time.  Wik idea  18:06, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Utterly undersourced. Should not be in main space as is. Wikipedia is not the yellow pages. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 21:49, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
 * I wanted to respond more fully following my short response yesterday. I have added a few more references and updated the page with some additional details. I stand by the observation that Wikipedia is not a listing of all sorts of companies and very often "startups" - which this effectively is - are not notable. This company has received sufficient coverage, mostly about their management issues, that would probably lift them over the bar. There are many ways to deal with undersourced articles: they can be expanded, tagged, moved or AfD'd, the avenue to be taken depends on many factors. However, it probably is not best practice to accuse editors of being "lazy" if the original article is not really the height of the art itself. I am not sure this would have passed AfC, for example, had it gone down this route. On a technical note, copy/paste page moves are generally discouraged as they lose the original article attribution. I shall request a history merge. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 08:19, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Well done - I take back the lazy comment. Thanks for adding references. Much better.  Wik idea  12:58, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

Just curious...
...as to what prompted you to move California Agricultural Labor Relations Act to California Agricultural Labor Relations Act of 1975 a while back. To my knowledge (and I'm pretty sure I'd know about it), there's only one such act, so no need to distinguish the way we do for the various Civil Rights Acts in US history. PS - Thanks for all the work you've put into legal articles. Regards, Anomalous+0 (talk) 11:22, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Just convention - better to have the year of an Act. It tells you a lot about why it was passed, who, etc.  Wik idea  13:26, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of New York Business Corporation Law


The article New York Business Corporation Law has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unsourced 3 sentence stub"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DannyS712 (talk) 09:41, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Russian interference in the 2016 Brexit referendum for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Russian interference in the 2016 Brexit referendum is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Russian interference in the 2016 Brexit referendum until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — JFG talk 22:39, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Russian interference in the 2016 Brexit referendum for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Russian interference in the 2016 Brexit referendum is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Russian interference in the 2016 Brexit referendum& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. RaviC (talk) 22:32, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

Rigby v Connol moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Rigby v Connol, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 08:51, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

September 2019
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Felthouse v Bindley. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 00:41, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Felthouse v Bindley, you may be blocked from editing. Dl2000 (talk) 21:17, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
 * You're a massive weirdo.  Wik idea  22:30, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

"E Warren" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect E Warren. Since you had some involvement with the E Warren redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. -- Tavix ( talk ) 02:29, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Clist mergers
Template:Clist mergers has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 17:14, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Unfair Contract Terms Bill


The article Unfair Contract Terms Bill has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Proposal from 2009, no assertion that it has progressed in the intervening 11 years or that it's at all notable. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hairy Dude (talk) 05:53, 22 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Updated for you!  Wik idea  10:38, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

Constitution of the United Kingdom
Thank you for your thorough re-write of this article and apologies for jumping on the bandwagon without perspective. Whizz40 (talk) 20:01, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
 * No worries at all mate! With such a long page and such a huge topic it takes heaps of time to understand everything there. I really must do much better at summarising. In all honesty, I wrote much of what was there quite quickly, and haven't come back to it since - so being picked up on this is very welcome.  Wik idea  08:51, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

DS Alert climate change
NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 22:13, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
 * FYI, I posted the same thing on my own talk page. These are FYI, no-fault notices.   For further details read links in the template. NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 22:13, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

Instead of Edit warring please explain your desired changes here
FYI I started the thread you should have started per BRD. You can add attempt to win consensus for your changes here. NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 22:36, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

"Trial of Jesus" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Trial of Jesus. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 1 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hog Farm Bacon 02:09, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Landmark Cases in the Law of Contract


The article Landmark Cases in the Law of Contract has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Delete Unsourced; WP:BEFORE reveals no sources that rise to the level required by WP:NBOOK."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:52, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Labour exchange
Are you going to fix the incoming links or are you going to leave fixing things to others? A labour exchange in British English is NOT an employment agency. You have failed to provide a hatnote to help those readers misled by you. The only mention of labour exchanges in the text of your preferred target is of the British ones. DuncanHill (talk) 13:12, 19 September 2020 (UTC)


 * This isn't accurate. A public employment agency is usually what people said was a labour exchange, although before the Labour Exchanges Act 1909 in fact the unions and perhaps municipal governments set them up. If you want to read more, then there's a good book by Freedland, Countouris et al, on Public Employment Agencies, and tonnes of articles if you search here: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=%22labour+exchange%22&btnG=  Wik idea  13:55, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

"Right to organize" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Right to organize. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 16 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:20, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

Organized labour project
Thank you for earlier joining the Organized Labour project. I've been a participant in the project since 2006 and am helping with a revival of it. As part this we are introducing a new membership system, which will help with communications among participants. This involves creating a membership file for each participant within your user space (you can see an example of my membership card here: User:Goldsztajn/WikiProjectCards/WikiProject Organized Labour). This system is already in operation within a number of wikiprojects (such as Women in Red and Medicine). You will not have to do anything, myself or someone else from the project will create the relevant file within your userspace. However, I am conscious that it is not polite to change an editor's userspace without notice. If I don't hear from you in the negative, I will go ahead with making the change after the 18th of January. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Many thanks for supporting the project, in solidarity,--Goldsztajn (talk) 11:23, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Relfo Ltd v Varsani


The article Relfo Ltd v Varsani has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Spy-cicle💥  Talk? 23:44, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

Butler v Rice moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Butler v Rice, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Chlod (say hi!) 02:54, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

"Matrimonial home" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Matrimonial home. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 23 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Dominicmgm (talk) 17:15, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Butler v Rice


Hello, Wikidea. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Butler v Rice".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 02:54, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Van Gend en Loos advert.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Van Gend en Loos advert.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:04, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Help with MP Materials Article
I work with MP Materials, a rare earth materials company. I noticed that you are a member of WikiProject Companies and wonder if you would consider reviewing my Request Edits to the article, which has been pending since August 20, 2021. Here is the link to the MP talk page with suggested edits. Talk:MP Materials Thank you for your consideration.Tmy350 (talk) 00:13, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Clist relations
Template:Clist relations has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:53, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Duties of local government in the United Kingdom for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Duties of local government in the United Kingdom is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Duties of local government in the United Kingdom until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. FollowTheTortoise (talk) 17:31, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Labour Party Rule Book for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Labour Party Rule Book is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Labour Party Rule Book& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 01:24, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Help with infobox financials
Hi, I see you’re a member of WP:COMPANIES.. I posted some updates to fix incorrect information about the financials for LMAX Group. The corrections are here: Talk:LMAX Group. I am a paid consultant for the company. Thanks. Sunshine0826 (talk) 18:29, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Garland J
Hello, Wikidea, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username CaroleHenson, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Garland J, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Garland J.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

–CaroleHenson (talk) 06:56, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Eurozone map left
Template:Eurozone map left has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:45, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Miles v European Schools


The article Miles v European Schools has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No indication of significance or non-routine coverage"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ITBF (talk) 12:14, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Miles v European Schools for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Miles v European Schools is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Miles v European Schools until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. ITBF (talk) 13:50, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Labour Party Rule Book


Hello, Wikidea. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Labour Party Rule Book".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 06:46, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

Smith v Fonterra Co-operative Group Ltd moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Smith v Fonterra Co-operative Group Ltd, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  Schwede 66  04:41, 24 April 2023 (UTC)


 * I see that the article is back in mainspace (no problem) but it got there by a cut-and-paste move (big problem!). The issue caused by that is that all the attribution history is lost. I shall repair that through what's called a history merge. Don't ever do that again; as a lawyer, you should be finely attuned to issues related to attribution and copyright. The correct way of renaming articles, or changing between namespaces is to move it. Any questions, please ask (please ping me if you do so).  Schwede 66  22:10, 25 April 2023 (UTC)


 * OK, thanks for explaining - and no problem to keep that in mind in future.  Wik idea  11:35, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Pinduoduo article help?
Hi, I’m an employee of Pinduoduo, one of the largest companies in Asia. I posted a proposal to make some updates about the company at Talk:Pinduoduo on the Pinduoduo Talk page, but there hasn’t been any discussion so far. I was wondering if you as a member of the Companies WikiProject might be willing to take a look at the proposal? Thanks very much. Snowy2000 (talk) 15:58, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

July 2023
Your edit to Pension Law Reform has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 21:37, 11 July 2023 (UTC)

Bill Carmody Draft
Hi! I see you are a member of WikiProject Law. I am seeking feedback on a draft I created about trial attorney Bill Carmody, of Susman Godfrey, who has been profiled in the press several times because of the size and prominence of his cases. I have explained more here: User talk:Backyard116/sandbox/Bill Carmody/Seeking feedback. He’s a personal connection of mine, so impartial advice on notability and neutral point of view would be greatly appreciated. Backyard116 (talk) 16:17, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Election denial movement for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Election denial movement is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Election denial movement until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. rootsmusic (talk) 01:49, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of R v Birmingham City Council, ex p Equal Opportunities Commission


The article R v Birmingham City Council, ex p Equal Opportunities Commission has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Does not meet WP:N"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 22:19, 5 March 2024 (UTC)