User talk:Wikidragonrider

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Nikita Anita Sundaram


A tag has been placed on Draft:Nikita Anita Sundaram, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. TLA (talk) 03:13, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

February 2024
Hello Wikidragonrider. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Wikidragonrider. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Seraphimblade Talk to me 20:06, 20 February 2024 (UTC)


 * @Seraphimblade They just moved it anyways! Should it be draftified again? Flux55 (my talk page) 20:13, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Nikita Anita Sundaram


A tag has been placed on Nikita Anita Sundaram, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Flux55 (my talk page) 20:18, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

February 2024
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Seraphimblade Talk to me 20:41, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Specifically, you were asked above regarding editing for pay, and instructed to not continue editing until that has been addressed. Instead, you carried right on with what you were doing. Before an unblock will be considered, an answer to the above question regarding editing for pay is required. Seraphimblade Talk to me 20:42, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
 * I haven't received any payment for editing. I did not know how to respond and continued. I actually saw it now . Wikidragonrider (talk) 20:50, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
 * If you are not affiliated with this individual, could you please explain how you took this close-up, clearly posed photograph of them? Seraphimblade Talk to me 20:59, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
 * {{unblock|reason= It is available on their LinkedIn profile and Facebook. It is on Google images too Wikidragonrider (talk) 21:00, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
 * According to the file page it is an image you own. Is this incorrect? PhilKnight (talk) 21:03, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Yes I have taken it from Google. I did not know how to add it to file . Wikidragonrider (talk) 21:05, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
 * I actually thought taking it from Google was a stock based image. That is why I stated it is own since I downloaded and attached it Wikidragonrider (talk) 21:07, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
 * The details are encyclopaedia about them so atleast I have to add some photo about them too Wikidragonrider (talk) 21:15, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

Why is it blocked
Would like to know why is it blocked ? I have stated I haven't received any payments and photo was also from google Wikidragonrider (talk) 21:21, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
 * In the immediate term, you were blocked because you did not respond regarding paid editing (and I will say right now, though you have now answered it, I am not very inclined to believe you are being honest about that.) Mislabeling the image as your own work when it was not is certainly something you shouldn't be doing either, but I wouldn't have blocked you for that alone. However, I will note that we do expect for editors to be honest with one another, and saying you took a photograph and then later saying you didn't does not exactly inspire confidence there. Seraphimblade Talk to me 21:24, 20 February 2024 (UTC)