User talk:Wikidudette

Notability of Velotique
A tag has been placed on Velotique requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Truthanado (talk) 22:39, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Courtney Goldman
A tag has been placed on Courtney Goldman requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Justin Eiler (talk) 22:40, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Centrality - definition
Centrality - The constant urge to create a reality that ends up circular. Meaning that the reality is only based to serve the purpose of creating a causal effect; ending in the original start position. Professor L. Z. Gouldman of Fraser State University coined the phrase:

"to create a circle is a fallacy, hence the circle only exists to support itself. This is impossible as the circle does not exist in our present world".

The inherent meaning is that self-substantiated meaning can only be self-serving.

Past Research:

Dr. Colin McEwan of Michigan State University(Circa. 1995) is credited with original research regarding the self-fulfilling prophesy-syndrome.(SFPS). S.F.P.S. is defined as the cause for media-centric self-replicating society. In layman's terms Dr. McEwan explained that people like to create their media reality by watching what they really want. Although simplistic in semantics, the overlying theme is that blame has a direct correlation to SFPS. Dr. McEwan taught that people avoid responsibility due to an inherent tendency to self-fulfill negative prophecies. People found it was easier to make mistakes then learn to avoid them. Naturally a fair amount of his peers avoided Dr. McEwan. His notoriously abrupt behavior was considered ironic considering the doctor preached SFPS.

Current Research:

Professor L. Z. Gouldman is currently attempting research at disproving his own theorem.

Centrality - definition
Centrality - The constant urge to create a reality that ends up circular. Meaning that the reality is only based to serve the purpose of creating a causal effect; ending in the original start position. Professor L. Z. Gouldman of Fraser State University coined the phrase:

"to create a circle is a fallacy, hence the circle only exists to support itself. This is impossible as the circle does not exist in our present world".

The inherent meaning is that self-substantiated meaning can only be self-serving.

Past Research:

Dr. Colin McEwan of Michigan State University(Circa. 1995) is credited with original research regarding the self-fulfilling prophesy-syndrome.(SFPS). S.F.P.S. is defined as the cause for media-centric self-replicating society. In layman's terms Dr. McEwan explained that people like to create their media reality by watching what they really want. Although simplistic in semantics, the overlying theme is that blame has a direct correlation to SFPS. Dr. McEwan taught that people avoid responsibility due to an inherent tendency to self-fulfill negative prophecies. People found it was easier to make mistakes then learn to avoid them. Naturally a fair amount of his peers avoided Dr. McEwan. His notoriously abrupt behavior was considered ironic considering the doctor preached SFPS.

Current Research:

Professor L. Z. Gouldman is currently attempting research at disproving his own theorem.

Proposed deletion of Centrality definition
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Centrality definition, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * non-notable idea (uncited, and only mentioned as primarysourced) and neologism

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. DMacks (talk) 04:33, 9 June 2009 (UTC)