User talk:Wikiedit4444444

April 2023
Hi Wikiedit4444444! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Fat men's club several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree&#32;at, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Until we either find agreement between the two of us, or a clear consensus forms among a larger group of editors in favor of the changes you are proposing, the article is supposed to stay the way it was before your contested change was made.. signed,Rosguill talk 20:54, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. signed,Rosguill talk 21:16, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

April 2023
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring, as you did at Fat men's club. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 21:43, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Physical attractiveness
I reverted your edit to Physical attractiveness because it is a substantial change to the article that deleted cited text, even though your replacement text is also cited. You made no attempt to balance the sources; although WP:AGEMATTERS may apply, we cannot rely on the judgement of Wikipedia editors that this source trumps that one. Your proposed text has merit but propose it first at the talk page to work out how best to integrate it. (Your contribution has not disappeared into the ether, you will be able to retrieve it from the article history.) I trust the incident above will have made you have come to appreciate that it is more effective to resolve differences of opinion first at the talk page. 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 22:47, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. signed,Rosguill talk 21:14, 9 December 2023 (UTC)