User talk:Wikieditingname

Speedy deletion nomination of Daniel Mann (lawyer)
A tag has been placed on Daniel Mann (lawyer) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Xhaoz  Talk  &bull;  Contribs  20:10, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Daniel Mann (lawyer)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Daniel Mann (lawyer), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Is this guy notable enough for Wikipedia? I've Googled his name, and found quite a few results, but it didn't really make him notable.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. LouriePieterse (talk) 11:09, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

welcome
I left a note on Talk:Daniel Mann (lawyer), saying that I thought, "in the current climate", it would be best to expand the article on the research center he was a founding fellow of, and included the biographical info we have on him in a section devoted to the founding fellows.

Mann did important work, but the existing consensus on how much someone has to do to have an article devoted solely to them is a relatively high bar to pass. If he had one remarkable human rights case he handled himself under his belt I'd help argue that he merited an article solely about him.

We have a "redirection" feature. Daniel Mann (lawyer) can be redirected to point to the article on the research center.

Oh, welcome to the wikipedia.

Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 16:48, 26 June 2009 (UTC)