User talk:Wikieditor321123



Hello, Wikieditor321123, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay.
 * Please sign your name on talk pages, by using four tildes ( ~ ). This will automatically produce your username and the date, and helps to identify who said what and when. Please do not sign any edit that is not on a talk page.
 * Check out some of these pages:
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Introduction to Wikipedia
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia | Cheatsheet of WikiCode


 * If you have a question that is not one of the frequently asked questions below, check out the Teahouse, [ ask me on my talk page], or click the button below. Happy editing and again, welcome! Rasnaboy (talk) 15:26, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

Schrodinger's galaxy
Schrodinger's galaxy is a mystery that stumped the whole space industry

The report is like this :

GLASS-Z13 is a conformed galaxy, while CEERS-1749, a potential candidate for a distant galaxy, was just published on paper based on the early release research programmes of the James Webb Space Telescope.

The CEERS-1749 appears to be a very bright galaxy that would have existed more than 200 million years after the Big Bang. If proved, our big Bang theory might be disproven.

However, the information offers two possible sites for the CEERS-1749, and no one is yet confident which is correct due to the necessity for additional research and observation. Astronomers dubbed it Schrodinger's galaxy candidate as a result. My theory on this galaxy that can prove multiverse:

According to me, this galaxy is a galaxy that's not from our universe. I mean, when this galaxy is formed about 200 million years after the big bang, this galaxy is older than 13.7 billion years. Now, if we look back in time 13.7 years ago, the universe didn't expand 13.7 billion years. Wikieditor321123 (talk) 15:49, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

March 2023
Hello, I'm DVdm. An edit that you recently made to Kinetic energy seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks!

Please note that the edits that you made here and here were no improvements. On the contrary. Also, grammer (which you use in both edit summaries) is a not an existing word. Note that there is nothing wrong with the usage of speed in the context of kinetic energy, so your correction of "a information mistake of the variable v from speed to velocity" was not a correction at all. - DVdm (talk) 08:35, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

Ok Wikieditor321123 (talk) 10:24, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Euler's Disk, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - DVdm (talk) 19:09, 12 March 2023 (UTC)