User talk:Wikieditorhans1

December 2023
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Wikipedia. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:8D06:D9EB:E40D:F0FC (talk) 19:16, 27 December 2023 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:949C:E0A2:4887:9292 (talk) 06:13, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.


 * You are really frustrated, i think. You deliberately removing the notable references like BBC, TOI, etc just to make this page delete. If you really want to improve the page and to contribute to wikipedia, rather than improving why you are removing valid and notable data and references. If you want to get this page deleted then please get it delete, you are trying to do this thing through IP because you do not want your account to come in light. These deliberate and vendetta acts are really shameful. Wikieditorhans1 (talk) 08:21, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
 * I have neither an account nor a vendetta. Please read WP:SIGCOV, I have linked it multiple times yet it is clear you have never read it, the same goes for WP:BLP. I do not particularly care if this page is retained or deleted, solely that it complies with our policies and guidelines of which WP:GNG is one. All of my edits have been made to improve the page and make it policy compliant, if you believe otherwise, you are welcome to contribute on its talk page, at WP:BLPN, or at the appropriate noticeboard for user conduct.
 * I prefer some opportunity to improve the page is good before sending it to AFD, which is why I have been trying to get other people to look the page over. For reasons that are unknown to me, you seemed determined to avoid getting outside attention on the article by removing the templates that are used for that purpose, which has forced my hand. If you had just allowed some time for the tags to attract outside attention to the article we would not be here now. If the article is not improved to the point that it meets GNG it will eventually be merged, redirected, or deleted.
 * If you wish to assist in demonstrating notability, please identify WP:THREE, WP:RELIABLE, WP:SECONDARY, WP:INDEPENDANT sources with WP:SIGCOV. Thank you. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:717D:4ED5:29EB:B341 (talk) 17:52, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
 * In all this long description you didn't mentioned that why you removed BBC news link. If you will see more closely then BBC is one of the recommended news reference by wikipedia. And do not use the word like "our ploicies", because it is always "wikipedia's" policies, this platform is open to all not your private property. If you are so concerned and are well versed about wikipedia's policies then whi don't you have account, because you just want to hide your identity, nothing else. Wikieditorhans1 (talk) 05:43, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
 * I explained my removal in my edit summary, and you still haven't read WP:SIGCOV. They are our policies, made by us, the community, and applying to us. Registration is not required and has both advantageous and disadvantages, one of which is that accounts are more anonymous rather than less as you mistakenly believe. All of this is off topic and thus far you have demonstrated neither a solid understanding of our policies, nor any desire to learn them. Please read the links you have been provided and then identify three reliable secondary independents sources with significant coverage as instructed. Until you do so the article's notability will remain in doubt. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:4D61:46E2:1501:4B6F (talk) 05:55, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Rajeev Ranjan Giri for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rajeev Ranjan Giri is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Rajeev Ranjan Giri until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. UtherSRG (talk) 00:23, 12 January 2024 (UTC)