User talk:Wikieditors25

June 2021
Hello, I'm Kingoflettuce. I noticed that you removed topically-relevant content from Kiaraakitty. However, Wikipedia is not censored. Please do not remove or censor information that directly relates to the subject of the article. If the content in question involves images, you have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide images that you may find offensive. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Kingoflettuce (talk) 16:15, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Kiaraakitty, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Kingoflettuce (talk) 16:16, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kiaraakitty, you may be blocked from editing. Kingoflettuce (talk) 17:31, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Kiaraakitty shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Nick Moyes (talk) 00:33, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Fraud allegations
Therefore "allegations", "alleged victims", "allegedly", etc. Kingoflettuce (talk) 17:36, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

There was no alleged fraud. Wikieditors25 (talk) 17:44, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Uh, yeah right...Kingoflettuce (talk) 17:48, 13 June 2021 (UTC)