User talk:Wikien2009/Archive 1

April 2006
Thank you for experimenting with the page Pelé on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia, which you are more than welcome to do. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. .:.Jareth.:. babelfish 12:14, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Ronaldinho. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox.  jaco plane  12:21, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Geoff hurst world cup goal.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Geoff hurst world cup goal.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 13:05, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Jersey_eisteddfod.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Jersey_eisteddfod.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 19:18, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Springfield_stadium.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Springfield_stadium.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 08:39, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

Mazaradi FOX
I want to thank you for what you did for Mazaradi FOX article and don't forget that i fuckin who created that page

LISTEN PUNK THAT'S MY ARTICLE...............................................

You made Mazaradi FOX and redirected from my article Mazaradi Fox.

I know that it's FOX not Fox. but that's not my problem that it got delete before. And you can look at the article history that I WHO CREATE IT

Your edits to Template:50 Cent
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Some of your recent edits have been considered unhelpful or unconstructive and have been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. --Zimbabweed 14:15, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Standing Ovation (album)
Regarding your speedy request for Standing Ovation (album), the reason you provided doesn't meet any of the WP:CSD. You may wish to use WP:AFD or prod instead. - C HAIRBOY (☎) 15:47, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Please Do Not Remove AfD Notices
Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages. The notices and comments are needed to establish community consensus about the status of an article, and removing them is considered vandalism. If you oppose the deletion of an article, you may comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Pyrospirit Talk  Contribs 16:05, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

50 Cent birth
Hi! I've noticed you've changed his birth date from 1976 to '75 (see the 50 Cent talk page under 'Birthday'). The most reliable source currently available should be used and a Rolling Stone magazine interview which states his birth should be a more reliable source than one like IMDB, which uses secondary info. See WP:RS. On another note, I've noticed that user SCB '92 has also made single edit changes for the date. Now I am by no means accusing you of using multiple accounts, but SCB '92 has edited very similar articles as you (hip-hop pages & soccer clubs). If it's not you, you have nothing to worry about. But just in case, Sock puppetry (using multiple accounts to create the illusion of greater support for an issue) goes against the policy and can lead to a block if reported. Thanks! Spellcast 18:29, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Also, if you look at a review of his autobiography 'From Pieces to Weight' on Amazon, you'll see an editorial review of the book (Publishers Weekly) saying he was born on 1976. Unless more reliable evidence is given, it will stay as that. Thanks! Spellcast 15:05, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

As was I was browsing through my contributions, I realised I sent you messages. Just to let you know, 1975 was indeed correct the whole time. I didn't change it previously because I didn't see his arrest record here (ID: 94-R-6378). That interview (which is now wrong) was the most reliable source available to me at the time. And the people who supposedly reviewed the book must've got wrong info on the net. Anyway, happy editing. Spellcast 12:17, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

Copyright issue with Mazaradi Fox}}}
Hello. Concerning your contribution, :, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from. As a copyright violation, : appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. : has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk: and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk: with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:.

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Butseriouslyfolks 21:47, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Mazaradi Fox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Butseriouslyfolks 21:47, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from your own work
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles that you have created yourself. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please place  on the page (please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the article's. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. --Butseriouslyfolks 21:57, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Edit summary
Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thanks, and happy editing. --Geniac 16:00, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Regarding Cashville records
I've unprotected the pertaining page; you should now be able to move it yourself (WP:MOVE). Cheers. Lectonar 15:56, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! Just a little reminder. Cheers. Lectonar 16:03, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Regarding your unprotection request
Hello, sorry I can't help you here; there are unfinished problems regarding WP:BLP, and as long as these persist, the artilce cannot move-unprotected; I'll keep it in mind, though. BTW, as I'm not always around, you can request these things at Requests for page protection. Cheers. Lectonar 14:19, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

Buck the World
Please do not capitalize "the" in this title. Regardless of how Amazon.com is capitalizing it (Amazon not being a proper source anyway), Wikipedia has certain guidelines for naming albums, singles, book and film titles, etc. Please see WP:ALBUMS for more information. Thanks. - eo 21:13, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Hey, thanks for switching that back. I did not realize that you moved it using copy & paste.... just a word of advice - DON'T move pages that way - not good.  It breaks up the edit history and you may have other editors and admins jumping on your back for that.  In the future, if you wanna move something, use the "Move" function, located at the top of the article.  The "Move" function moves the article and the talk page and automatically creates a redirect for you.  See ya! - eo 21:23, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
 * The reason is because Wikipedia set up certain style guidelines for titles with prepositional words and articles such as "a", "an", "the", etc. If "the" was the first word in the title it would be capitalized but in this case it is not.  It is explained here. - eo 21:29, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
 * XXL chose to capitalize "The" for their publication. Wikipedia style guides state that "the" should be lowercase.  That is just how articles are titled on Wikipedia - don't know what else to tell ya.  I'm honestly just trying to save you aggravation - trust me, if you move it to "The", someone else will undoubtedly move it to the lower-case version. - eo 22:32, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Metallica (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 17:26, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

G-Unit Members
Please stop the vandalizing you have done to the G-Unit article, replacing the actual members and renaming them to made up people. Thanks.


 * Tha Iceman73 Talk 16:28, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

Take a look at this link: http://i75.photobucket.com/albums/i294/Ajith3/Miscellaneous/Screen%20Shots/Vandalism.jpg


 * Tha Iceman73 Talk 17:48, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Extended Aftermath Entertainment family
An editor has nominated Extended Aftermath Entertainment family, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 19:47, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Makaveli Branded
hey u made an error it says his son when it should be her son can u correct this thanx. -- Supreme euphanasia 17:03, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

D12's next album
Please stop vandalizing Wikipedia. Kuniva, member of D12, said that the album is NOT titled 'Natural Born Killers'. If English is your first language then you should learn more if it. Best wishes!

--Impala63 23:16, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Tupac's birth name
There is an ongoing discussion at the talk page for Tupac Shakur about his birth name. Please refrain from adding in details until the matter is cleared up. Thank you. - Mysekurity 21:50, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

March 26 2007
Please stop. If you continue to blank out (or delete portions of) page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Purgatory Fubar Converse or Snafu 18:11, 26 March 2007 (UTC)


 * This is your last warning. The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Purgatory Fubar  Converse or Snafu 20:35, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, but it looks as though this article is now a copyright infringement word for word from http://music.aol.com/artist/g-unit/555598/biography if this is not changed the article WILL qualify for speedy deletion. Please consider changing it. Thank you. Purgatory Fubar Converse or Snafu 17:23, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

G-Unit West
A tag has been placed on G-Unit West, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a. If you can indicate how G-Unit West is different from the previously posted material, or if you can indicate why this article should not be deleted, I advise you to place the template hangon underneath the other template on the article, and also put a note on Talk:G-Unit West saying why this article should stay. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 4 under General criteria. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we request you to follow these instructions. --Geniac 04:59, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Swift discography, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template   to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Berserkerz Crit 16:22, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Kuniva discography, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template   to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Berserkerz Crit 16:22, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Kon Artis discography, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template   to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Berserkerz Crit 16:23, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Proof discography, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template   to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Berserkerz Crit 16:23, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Bizarre discography, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template   to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Berserkerz Crit 16:24, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Disruption
I've blocked you for an hour for your disruptive editing. When the block expires, please start editing according to our guidelines and policies. --Mel Etitis ( Talk ) 22:35, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

re: 50 Cent images
Hi there. As I understand it, album and single images should not be used in discography pages per Fair use criteria. I know that a lot of discographies have images already - however I've got a bunch of discog pages on my watchlist and I've noticed many of them having their images removed, either by editors or bots. So I suppose ultimately the goal is to comply with fair use rules and have all the images gone, except for within the articles about the particular album or single. - eo 11:43, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Re: 50 Cent discography
I asked an admin by the name of ShadowHalo if removing album covers on discography pages is valid. Although it is a disputed issue, if you look under 'Discographies' at WikiProject Music/MUSTARD, it says it's unnecessary. Spellcast 16:22, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Regarding edits to 50 Cent vs. Cam'ron feud
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, Peterm1991! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule \bexample\.com, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links policy for more information. If the link was to an image, please read Wikipedia's image tutorial on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was intended to promote a site you own, are affiliated with, or will make money from inclusion in Wikipedia, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 21:15, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

The page was blanked so I thought something was wrong. I am sorry. However I think Curtis (50 Cent album) was in fact copied from Untitled 50 Cent album, not the opposite. 19991609an

Final warning
If you continue to insist on non-standard formatting, disruptive editing, and near-vandalism, then you will be blocked from editing. --Mel Etitis ( Talk ) 22:07, 5 April 2007 (UTC)


 * It's been explained to you over and over again, by me and by others. Please don't pretend injured innocence. --Mel Etitis  ( Talk ) 22:13, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

Regarding edits to PornoTube
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, Peterm1991! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule pornotube\.com, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links policy for more information. If the link was to an image, please read Wikipedia's image tutorial on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was intended to promote a site you own, are affiliated with, or will make money from inclusion in Wikipedia, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 15:58, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Tim Westwood
I'm afraid I have had to remove some of your contribution to Tim Westwood. I am sure that it was good intentioned but please participate in the talk page discussion before making disputed changes. In the case of the category about the birth date, we decided at some length to take the date out of the article at the current time due to a confusion about the actual fact. Per Biographies of living persons, all information must be very carefully sourced before adding it to the article. In terms of the debate about his DOB, Escaper7 has put a lot of time into researching the evidence for this and we concluded that it was best not to add the date in until we could carefully reference the article and write a brief discussion about how it is disagreed. We had already received an email that may have come from a representative of Tim Westwood requesting that that 1957 date be removed and so we are going to make very sure that we reference it correctly before putting it back in. As an editor who is clearly interested in contributing to the article, I encourage you to make your feelings heard on the talk page and contribute to our discussion so that we can work out how best to proceed. But please don't keep adding stuff back in that has been removed by consensus at the talk page. Regards. Will (aka  Wimt  ) 19:18, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Disruption
The commets above indicate the continuation of your disruptive edits, as do your other contributions. I've judt discovered you adding links to "Time A Tell", which you created as a redirect to one of the pages from which you linked it. This is pointless, absurd, and against Wikipedia guidelines. This is a final warning; the next disruptive edit and you will be blocked without further warning. --Mel Etitis ( Talk ) 20:29, 16 April 2007 (UTC) You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia  as a result of your . You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. --Mel Etitis ( Talk ) 21:28, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

Autoblocked

 * I've left a note on the blocking admin's talk page. -  auburn pilot  talk  20:04, 23 April 2007 (UTC)


 * On the basis of this notice, at least, the block shouldn't be reviewed, as it's not an autoblock but a direct block (hence my block notice above). --Mel Etitis ( Talk ) 21:11, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:G_unit.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:G_unit.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 06:33, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

Fair use images
I have marked the following three images for deletion. They are marked as fair use album covers, and only used in a speedily deleted article Two Five. Unless they are used in an article, they will be deleted after a week. - Mike Rosoft 12:32, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Image:Djwhiteowl---two-five---sou.jpg
 * Image:Twofivecovernew.jpg
 * Image:WiTwofive.gif

Unspecified source for Image:Eminem2004NBAFinals.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Eminem2004NBAFinals.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self-no-disclaimers tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:07, 26 April 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Muchness 21:07, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Disruption
You're still reverting articles to non-MoS and non-WikiProject formatting; that will lead to another block if you don't stop. --Mel Etitis ( Talk ) 14:53, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia  as a result of your . You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. --Mel Etitis ( Talk ) 18:10, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

G-Unit redirects
OK, I've turned those into redirects; given that they were "salted", I'm inclined not to unprotect (and I hope I'm not going to have creating them as redirects blow up in my face, either). Redirecting that other too looks like a good idea, yes. Alai 16:30, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Lloyd Banks
Please leave it as

group_or_band

rather than

solo_singer

because Lloyd Banks is not a solo artist he is part of a GROUP —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 90.241.158.189 (talk) 17:09, 12 May 2007 (UTC).

Fair use rationale for Image:SamTheKid-Trabalha.ogg
Thanks for uploading Image:SamTheKid-Trabalha.ogg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 14:31, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Notability of Dangerous LLC
seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. --Android Mouse Bot 2 20:57, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Mugshot 50-Cent-a.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Mugshot 50-Cent-a.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aksibot 07:53, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Template:Eminem
Please stop reverting the template to the version with the underground/bootleg albums. Nobody needs to see what bootleg albums there are. Just keep to the basics.

50 Cent
Hi there. Is there a reason Jam Master Jay and Columbia keep being removed from the record labels in the infobox? We're documenting his history and not just keeping up with current events. If we were to only put the labels he's currently on as you say, does that mean we should remove Shady/Aftermath/G-Unit/Interscope when he retires? If you think it should be removed, please bring it up in the talk page. Thanks. Spellcast 23:28, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

KyleXY
Hey, what's your source for those new characters you added? Matthew 11:49, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
 * OK, well we need a verifiable secondary source (see WP:NOR). I've removed them from the article pending this. Matthew 12:01, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

The Black Wall Street Records
The other editors had sources for the members. They are not notable and thus the article was semi-protected due to vandalism and edit warring. I am just doing what an administrator is doing, Swajester will probably revert the edits himself if I don't. There is this whole discussion on this guy's talk page and one guy even got indefinitely blocked partly due to his involvement in the edit war. I strongly suggest you do not take any part in yet another edit war as you might be blocked. Don't get me wrong, I would like to see the roster there too, but if an administrator says we should not add them, then we must follow the rules (I think it has stuff to do with notability, we even deleted the Nu Jerzey Devil article). Feel free to help improving the article in other ways, like you did with the The Black Wall Street Journal Vol. 2 article (I think it was you, I don't remember). Thank you. --- Efil4tselaer: Resurrected 13:18, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Also, if you think everything in that article is unsourced, simply add a template at the end of the unsourced statement. --- Efil4tselaer: Resurrected 13:25, 9 June 2007 (UTC)