User talk:Wikiexpert1234567

Draft:Chris McGinn
Hi, please take note of this edit I did to the above article – per MOS:PUNCTREF, there should be no spaces between citations or between a full stop (or comma etc.) and a citation. Regards J ACKINTHE  B  OX   • TALK 16:23, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Sidharth Sogani


Hello, Wikiexpert1234567. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Sidharth Sogani.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 04:12, 14 July 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (September 9)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Wikiexpert1234567/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Wikiexpert1234567/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Wikiexpert1234567/sandbox Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Liance&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Wikiexpert1234567/sandbox reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-Liancetalk/contribs 18:07, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

User:Wikiexpert1234567/sandbox


Hello, Wikiexpert1234567. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, User:Wikiexpert1234567/sandbox.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 20:18, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of CREBACO Global
Hello Wikiexpert, I was unable to find sufficient coverage of CREBACO Global in reliable, independent sources. The cited sources are press releases from the company and one passing mention that cites them. I've therefore proposed the article for deletion, meaning that if no one objects the article may be deleted in a week. If you disagree with the rationale given or are otherwise opposed to its deletion, you are free to remove the proposed deletion tag from the article. The article may still be nominated for a deletion discussion later. If you have any questions about editing, come ask at the Teahouse. – Thjarkur (talk) 16:15, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
 * I removed this link to crebaco . Do you have a WP:COI with this firm? Jtbobwaysf (talk) 12:58, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
 * and suspicious looking contributions for this subject. Please have a look. Thanks! Jtbobwaysf (talk) 13:05, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

notice
Jtbobwaysf (talk) 13:00, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of CREBACO Global


The page CREBACO Global has been deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. As the page met any of these strictly-defined criteria, it was deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been deleted are:
 * It appeared to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 331dot (talk) 13:05, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Users who are not admins cannot delete articles; I have done so. 331dot (talk) 13:06, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

April 2020
Hello Wikiexpert1234567. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Wikiexpert1234567. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. David Gerard (talk) 13:29, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. MER-C 17:03, 28 April 2020 (UTC)