User talk:Wikifan114

Nomination of Almondo Vick for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Almondo Vick is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Almondo Vick until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  J 947  04:17, 22 February 2017 (UTC) http://isufootballalumni.blogspot.com/2008/04/indiana-state-football-alumni_22.html

February 2017
Hello, I'm RileyBugz. I noticed that in this edit to Almondo Vick, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. RileyBugz Yell at me &#124; Edits  22:56, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with this edit to Almondo Vick. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   10:01, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Please stop removing Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages as you did with this edit to Almondo Vick. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   10:03, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   10:05, 23 February 2017 (UTC)