User talk:Wikifiveoh

Welcome!
Hello, Wikifiveoh, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful: Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! Thomas.W talk 09:07, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Correct indentation on talk pages
Hello. I've added a comment about it on Talk:Vikings, but wanted to make sure you read it, because your repeated changes to my talk page indentation (the colons added before the text) irritates me. Read Indentation, and do as it says, which happens to be the way I do it, and stop messing with my indentation. Thomas.W talk 14:15, 23 July 2014 (UTC)


 * The 'welcome' lectures are not necessary, however well intentioned they might be. On indentation I do what appears to work best and is good practice as I see done by other users. I cannot guarantee to do everything by the Wikipedia manual - I'd need a PhD in that to get everything 'right'. This does raise a more important point however - it is well known that Wikipedia contributions are declining as established users who are 'really into it' are putting other contributors off by effectively requiring a Wikipedia 'pilot's license' before he/she is made to feel properly welcome. Content suffers as a result. If I am doing something appallingly wrong, politely ask someone else to raise it with me, as I am not receptive to bossy 'do not' comments. Wikifiveoh (talk) 18:04, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
 * I see that Thomas had a hissy fit since then and quit wikipedia. I too have had wikipedians try to turn me off from wikipedia by going nuts over small typos. I think in 99% of those cases they are really just mad at themselves for other reasons and look to take it out on people on the internet aka, they are a troll. ignore em. Popish Plot (talk) 20:51, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for sharing your thoughts Popish Plot. I have found that it isn't just typos and procedural 'errors' that irritate such people - they also don't take well to having their opinions undermined (often by those pesky things called facts) and so procedural 'perfection' may be used as a defence tactic. It is possible that 'Thomas' has just passed away...quite a few of the more obsessive contributors are retirees of advanced years (so have the time). Wikifiveoh (talk) 00:05, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Stockholm Metro art stations
I have inserted mention in the two articles covering the Stockholm Metro system ('Stockholm Public Transport' and 'Stockholm Metro') of the remarkable and permanent art installations that are all over the system. I am surprised that no mention was inserted previously, as this makes the system particularly special. If other contributors want to expand on what I have done, then that would be most welcome. Perhaps a suitable picture or two could be inserted, as it really is a visual feast (I am new here and haven't got to inserting pictures myself yet). The reference I used is http://twistedsifter.com/2012/05/stockholm-metro-worlds-longest-art-gallery/, which seems good to me, but perhaps another one would be better. Wikifiveoh (talk) 13:18, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Hi. Saw your post, while I was here for other reasons and wanted to share my experiences: Be careful about the FOP (Freedom of Panorama) rules Wikifiveoh. I have uploaded several pictures from Denmark for example, depicting murals, sculptures and statues in the public space. In Denmark there is only FOP of buildings and not works of art apparently, so nearly everything got deleted! Pretty depressing. Try researching about the FOP rules of Sweden, before uploading pictures of art. You can also try asking User:Túrelio for example. Great link btw, Ive never been there, looks impressive! RhinoMind (talk) 22:08, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Chaheel Riens (talk) 12:48, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

November 2022
Your recent editing history at Duesenberg shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Bishonen &#124; tålk 13:08, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:28, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)