User talk:Wikifriend1000

Hello Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Marcus Bastiaan, please cite a reliable source See Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. --Smokeyfire (talk) 05:02, 5 November 2017 (UTC)Smokeyfire

Image tagging for File:Bastiaan2017(2).png
Thanks for uploading File:Bastiaan2017(2).png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:31, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Marcus Bastiaan.png
Thanks for uploading File:Marcus Bastiaan.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text  below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 13:29, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Removing Facts
Hi when removing information like you did when you edited Marcus Bastiaan it helps usually to cite a reason for doing so. --Smokeyfire (talk) 12:42, 4 December 2017 (UTC)Smoekyfre

You may want to read this Three revert rule. --Smokeyfire (talk) 08:01, 5 December 2017 (UTC)Smokeyfire

Orphaned non-free image File:Marcus Bastiaan.png
Thanks for uploading File:Marcus Bastiaan.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:00, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Bastiaan2017.png
Thanks for uploading File:Bastiaan2017.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 20:00, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Your editing history and Wikipedia policies
I have noticed that your edits on Wikipedia have been almost exclusively to one article. I feel I need to make you aware of a couple of Wikipedia's policies. These are - Single-purpose account and Conflict of interest. Please have a look at where those links take you. Your editing history clearly makes the first of them relevant. I note from your Edit summaries that you appear to have a very strong, personal knowledge of the subject Marcus Bastiaan. That can be a sign of the second of those policies having some relevance.

Personally, I would strongly recommend that you spread your wings on Wikipedia. Look at some other articles. See if you can improve them. New, constructive contributors are always welcome. Maintaining this encyclopaedia is a big task. And looking at other articles will make you a better editor. HiLo48 (talk) 09:38, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Revert
Hello on several occasions you have reverted edits made on Marcus Bastiaan and not explained your reason in future it helps yours the modifications you made if you cite a reason. --110.22.50.32 (talk) 08:14, 17 July 2018 (UTC)110.22.50.32110.22.50.32 (talk) 08:14, 17 July 2018 (UTC) You may like to edit Michael Kroger --110.22.50.32 (talk) 09:49, 17 July 2018 (UTC)110.22.50.32

Suggestion
Hi would you be interested in creating a page based on James Newbury. I ask this of you seeing as almost all your edits are on Marcus Bastiaan Newbury was backed by Bastiaan I thought I would suggest this to you.--110.22.50.32 (talk) 06:54, 8 August 2018 (UTC)110.22.50.32110.22.50.32 (talk) 06:54, 8 August 2018 (UTC) James Newbury has a few article about him online.--110.22.50.32 (talk) 06:59, 8 August 2018 (UTC)110.22.50.32110.22.50.32 (talk) 06:59, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

Image
If you continue to edit on Bastiaan you may like to upload another image on Marcus Bastiaan see the template for it on Talk:Marcus Bastiaan.--110.22.50.32 (talk) 07:25, 8 August 2018 (UTC)110.22.50.32--

Heads up
Hey mate you may want to keep an eye on Marcus Bastiaan people add stuff about him like to go against Bastiaan. The article should at least be not so partial. Hope your going well mate keep an eye on what they write about you.

Removing cited information
Hi you recently removed information on the page Marcus Bastiaan and claimed it was inaccurate I invite you to explain why it is? not accurate on Talk:Marcus Bastiaan even though it is sourced.--110.22.50.32 (talk) 12:33, 15 August 2018 (UTC)110.22.50.32--