User talk:Wikijoehead

Beautiful chess
Trying to add mention to article Chess was inappropriate since this variant article currently has no supporting WP:RS or therefore WP:Notability. Please stop seeding mentions of this variant into other articles until the article can show supporting references. (Even then, I doubt a mention in article Chess is warranted.) Ihardlythinkso (talk) 19:27, 18 November 2013 (UTC)


 * You've ignored my message above and re-seeded into two articles. If you do that one more time, I'll file a WP:AfD on the Beautiful chess article, and the chances are that it will succeed meaning the article will be removed from WP. Ihardlythinkso (talk) 12:12, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Greetings! I don´t understand why are you being so mean to me. I dont cause you any damage and I am in no way a threat to you. I only try to write small article about one small variation. Why are you threatening to delete it, why are you so aggresive to me? Everything I try you go and delete it. I wouldn´t dare to do this to someone else. You are some kind of god, to decide on yourself deleting things? Please think about your behaviour. Have a nice day. (It would be only fair to explain your attitude, thank you.)


 * I do not have an "attitude" and I am not "being mean", so please stop with the accusations. You seeded your article into mature and important article Chess, and that was inappropriate for more than one reason. One reason is that your article lacks any supporting WP:Reliable sources (how many times have I informed you of that so far? - several). For that same reason, seeding mention of the article in the other articles you have seeded it by warring with me, was inappropriate. Please read WP:MADEUP. By the way, the aggressive editor is you, through your edit warring reverts without discussion (WP:BRD), and baseless personal accusations above as mentioned. So stop it, please. Ihardlythinkso (talk) 14:40, 19 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Thought I'd make you aware of Articles for deletion/Beautiful chess if you weren't already. IMO your variant shows some nice creative impetus and your group (assuming you're part of the inventing group) should try to get the attention of reliable publisher(s) so you can have a basis for placing it on WP again in future, to stay. You also might want to create a descriptive entry for Beautiful Chess at www.chessvariants.org (The Chess Variant Pages). Good luck, Ihardlythinkso (talk) 15:46, 27 November 2013 (UTC)