User talk:Wikiking123454321

No original research
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. ■ ∃ Madeline ⇔ ∃ Part of me ; 18:12, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics
■ ∃ Madeline ⇔ ∃ Part of me ; 18:12, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

You have recently made edits related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. This is a standard message to inform you that post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Contentious topics.

You have recently made edits related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. This is a standard message to inform you that India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Contentious topics. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 20:01, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

August 2023
Hi Wikiking123454321! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor&#32;at Jussie Smollett‎ that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. -- Toddy1 (talk) 20:16, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edit(s) you made did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! -- Toddy1 (talk) 20:17, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32 to insert a controversy section into the article on Pakistan Army. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. You have done this: Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. So far you have made zero edits to the article talk page to explain your point of view.
 * 1) 20:42, 27 May 2023, which you falsely marked as a minor edit
 * 2) 15:11, 28 May 2023 Undid revision and removal of historically accepted facts made due to political bias and propaganda
 * 3) 22:07, 21 June 2023 Undid revision 1157972949 by Nubia86 (talk) (The Wikipedia: Controversy article specifically mentions a "Controversy" section for distinct groups of controversies broadly covered in reliably sources)
 * 4) 11:34, 31 July 2023 Undid revision 1161315712 by Nubia86 (talk) Nubia86 for some reason keeps undoign this editing, even after specific Wikipedia instructions cited for adding a new body, and the added information is not mentioned before, possibly due to bias

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. -- Toddy1 (talk) 20:38, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.