User talk:Wikilagata

Internal Biblical Evidence of Jesus' Historicity
It looks like this article will be deleted from Wikipedia (WP) in the next day or two. We appreciate the work and thought that has gone into it. However, it is 'Original Research' which is one of the categories not permitted on WP (all articles have to be verifiable against outside sources).

My suggestion is that you put it on your personal website and you can then set a link to it from a suitable WP article. BlueValour 03:15, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

This could possibly be linked to the Historicity of Jesus article.  (aeropagitica)   (talk)   07:05, 19 June 2006 (UTC)


 * This article will be deleted. Just in case it is, I have stored a copy at User:Wikilagata/Internal Biblical Evidence of Jesus' Historicity if you want to copy it to a personal Website. — M e ts 501  (talk) 13:42, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

Authorship of the Pauline letters
Hey how are ya? No weasal words. What scholars said that about the delivery of Pauls letters you know IN THE ARTICLE. Please Pretty please. LoveMonkey 12:13, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Astacio.JPG
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Astacio.JPG, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Liftarn 16:46, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:06 15 05 ortiz tn.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:06 15 05 ortiz tn.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 02:33, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:40-40 soriano.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:40-40 soriano.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 01:36, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Globalwarmingandsundata1.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Globalwarmingandsundata1.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 17:08, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Image:Solar variation and global warming.gif
I deleted this image because it was badly wrong - you had misinderstood the solar data. See Image talk:Solar variation and global warming.gif William M. Connolley 17:14, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Please do not upload copyrighted images. This is considered Vandalism. See WP:COPYVIO. Thank you. Michaelbusch 16:07, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Image:MVP06.png listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:MVP06.png, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bigr Tex  22:30, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Image:Totalclassics.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Totalclassics.jpg, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bigr Tex  22:32, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Heystoopidac.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Heystoopidac.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. βcommand 21:57, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Chris Hammond.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Chris Hammond.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:43, 6 March 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rossrs (talk) 12:43, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

File:Ryanhoward.JPG listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ryanhoward.JPG, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Mosmof (talk) 04:49, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Twisted Tea


The article Twisted Tea has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * The article gives no indication that this is a notable product.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Salimfadhley (talk) 14:23, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:TwistedTea.JPG
 Thanks for uploading File:TwistedTea.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:30, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Immaculate Conception - Orthodox view
In an edit summary to the article Immaculate Conception you said this: "qualified Met. Kallistos' are as representing the ecumenical wing of Eastern Orthodoxy". I don't understand what this means - are you saying that Kallistos doesn't represent Orthodoxy? This matters, as we need to give the representative view from the Orthodox church. Achar Sva (talk) 03:18, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

Yes, this is the opinion of one Bishop. There are several conciliar documents, representing several Bishops, which reject the Immaculate Conception. The 1895 Council of Constantinople does so explicitly.wikilagata(talk) 14:28, 25 November 2020

=