User talk:Wikilove123

Talk:wikilove123/Archive 20

Feel free to ask for my help in the future. Questions, frustrations with others in wikipedia, problems, advice on editing, etc.VK35 16:00, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Look at this list of people willing to adopt you. [] After looking at this list, if you still wish me to adopt you, I will gladly do so.

In wikipedia, when writing personal messages like this one, sign them so people know who sent it. Use the ~ sign four times to sign and the computer will automatically add your name and the time. The ~ is to the left of "1" on U.S. keyboards but somewhere else on French keyboards. Or look near the bottom of the page where it says "Sign you username" and click those 4 ~. VK35 16:12, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

I added a box on your user page about being adopted because it's sometimes easier to do it than explain how to do it. If you don't like it, please remove it. Usually, I don't change people's user page.VK35 16:20, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Remember to sign your messages. I am creating a new article right now. It's Lawrence Yannuzzi, in case you want to watch it grow. Usually, I just edit articles, not create new ones. Creating new articles is not easy. I recently did McDonnell Douglas v. Green.VK35 16:23, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

As your adopter, I looked at your contributions. I am perplexed with the Santa comment. If done too much, people may take it the wrong way and say it is vandalism. Vandalism is punished in wikipedia. Try clicking "random article" to the left, see a whole lot of articles, and maybe try rewording something that is awkwardly written. Or just read. Good luck!VK35 16:57, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

U MY BEST FREND!

sockpuppetry is a potentially very serious charge
There is a sockpuppet tag on your user page. Sockpupptry is a very serious charge. If you are a sock puppet, you should immediately stop and discuss the situation with me. There are already indications that the accusation is true.

If your intentions are good and you have good character, I am more than willing to help you with advice. However, if your intentions are those of conflict or vandalism, then eventually I will not be able to be your adopter.VK35 16:22, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Anna Zippel
Thanks for your notes on my talk page. I'm glad you've returned and are trying to edit constructively.

I don't think Anna Zippel was an attack page. If you look at the author's contributions, you'll see he/she is doing a whole bunch of articles on witch trials in Sweden in the 17th century. It looks like the article just needs to be expanded and sourced; I've added the appropriate tags. Also, WP:BLP does not apply to dead people. Finally, I removed the attack warning that you gave the author. Please reserve that warning for obvious attacks on living people. Thanks, NawlinWiki 17:01, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

I received a message from an IP from someone claiming to be you. If it is you, note that editing by evading a block is not permitted. You're in a difficult situation because I didn't see any constructive edits while you were editing. The best I can think of is to wait a few months then ask to be unblocked. Maybe you could work on a proposed article or edit and post it to your user page as evidence of good intent. I'm not certain if that would be sufficient evidence for someone to unblock you. VK35 20:03, 7 June 2007 (UTC)