User talk:Wikimaster454

Welcome!
Hello, Wikimaster454, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to McKinsey & Company does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! GermanJoe (talk) 15:35, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Paul Mango
Hi! Thanks for your contributions to the Paul Mango article. Thanks also for removing that unsourced claim ("Attempts by his primary opponents to make this known...") which I'd accidentally restored. I'm curious though as to why you think the words "who supports kneeling for the national anthem" belong in the first sentence of the article? It doesn't seem like particularly vital information to me – I think it might belong in the article, but probably further down. It's also a bit vague – if the reader doesn't know the political context of the U.S. national anthem protests (2016–present) they might wonder what it means or why it's significant. Looking forward to hearing your thoughts. – Arms &amp; Hearts (talk) 21:40, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Edit-warring on Scott Wagner
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 15:06, 23 August 2018 (UTC)


 * You were alerted about the 3-revert rule. Self-revert immediately. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 15:17, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

August 2018
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Doug Weller talk 15:45, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions alert for articles and content relating to post-1932 American politics and biographies of living or recently deceased people
Doug Weller talk 15:52, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

August 2018
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Gogo Dodo (talk) 15:57, 23 August 2018 (UTC)