User talk:Wikimench100

A belated welcome!
Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Wikimench100. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia: Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on, consult Questions, or place helpme on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! KennethSides (talk) 14:41, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Che: Rise & Fall, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nat Geo. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Eduardo Montes-Bradley, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AMIA. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

White: A Season in the Life of John Borden Evans
Hi. Re: White: A Season in the Life of John Borden Evans, we still need more independent reliable sources. Winning an award at a relatively minor, and local, film festival like the Richmond International Film Festival would not be enough to meet WP:NFILM. I'm certainly not proposing that the article be deleted, though I am beginning to wonder if all these short docs should not be better merged into single article on the Heritage Film Project as an example of a Category:Documentary film series -- though I won't be doing that in any hasty or unilateral way, I assure you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:03, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Hi Shawn, I agree, perhaps an article on Heritage Film Project could be the way to go, although I’m afraid that if could be preview as promotional, and that would not look good. John Borden Evans seems to hold his own, besides the production company and the directo. His artwork is in the personal collection of such names as Tom Wolfe, Dave Mathews and others... Perhaps the film needs more time to make a more significant impact? PS. Would this be a good example concerning the series of short films by Heritage Film Project at the University of Virginia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Bell_Laboratory_Science_SeriesWikimench100 (talk) 05:18, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Monroe Hill, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Coda. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:33, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Monroe Hill, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Civil War. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:35, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited H. C. Erik Midelfort, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page UVA. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:51, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Heritage Film Project, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Diario Clarín and Museo Nacional de Bellas Artes. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Heritage films Collection
There have been several articles from various sources dealing with collections in ways similar to yours. As a librarian, I think that it is very important to spread & preserve knowledge of such collections, but I'm uncomfortable with the idea of listing the complete contents. But although of course this can be done on their own web page, and linked to here,, it is true that we are a more permanent location. I'm trying to devise some way of handling them other than mainspace. Possible a new space entirely, possibly WP space pages listing resources. Others are thinking about this too.

I'm particular dubious about trying to write articles both on the collections,and on the individual films. This looks a little too much like promotion. Most specially, if you are going to write hese articles, the main article should just list the films and make the link-- people will find the description there. I'd be glad to hear your thoughts on this.  DGG ( talk ) 01:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

DGG

Thank you for you comments and suggestions. In fact I believe you're right in many ways. One of the main reasons behind the problem you so clearly outlined comes from the fact that the articles were not planned in advance. There was first an inherited article on the filmmaker which we continue to developed at the same time that we were creating some of the articles on films related to subjects in which we were interested. Then someone suggested, I can't remember who di so now, that an article should be written on Heritage Film Project in order to avoid the long list of films on the filmmakers entry and we felt that was most reasonable so we started to work on the HFP entry and started to work on making the filmmakers page a bit less of a catalogue listing. We shall continue to work and adapt this entries in search of a balanced perspective that would show the filmmaker's trials and tribulations while concentrating on the HFP to list the production of the period 2008-present. And here's another issue since most of the production of EMB is not necessarily with HFP. With regards to the individual pages for certain titles those are only on the most popular or successful titles such as Che Rise and Fall, Samba on Your Feet, Evita and a few others. For what we know neither the HFP, nor the filmmaker have a descent website and the websites they had have been quite unreliable and unstable. We feed mostly on publish interviews on the press, google alarms, and in some instances on interviews with members of the cast or crews, or colleges. Any thoughts?Wikimench100 (talk) 04:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Eduardo Montes-Bradley, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hector Olivera. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Contrakultura Films, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eccentric. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Cortazar sin Barba 3er edition.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Cortazar sin Barba 3er edition.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:38, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Mad Princes of Renaissance Germany.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Mad Princes of Renaissance Germany.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:08, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

May 2017
Hello, I'm Zackmann08. Thank you for your recent contributions to Andrea Wulf. I noticed that when you added the image to the infobox, you added it as a thumbnail. In the future, please do not use thumbnails when adding images to an infobox (see WP:INFOBOXIMAGE). What does this mean? Well in the infobox, when you specify the image you wish to use, instead of doing it like this:

SomeImage.jpg

Instead just supply the name of the image. So in this case you can simply do:

SomeImage.jpg.

There will then be a separate parameter for the image caption such as Some image caption. Please note that this is a generic form message I am leaving on your page because you recently added a thumbnail to an infobox. The specific parameters for the image and caption may be different for the infobox you are using! Please consult the Template page for the infobox being used to see better documentation. Thanks! Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 17:53, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:NewYorkTimesLithotripter.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:NewYorkTimesLithotripter.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Train2104 (t • c) 22:44, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:RussiaGillenwaterAwarded.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:RussiaGillenwaterAwarded.jpeg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Train2104 (t • c) 22:48, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:RussiaGillenwaterAwarded.jpeg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:RussiaGillenwaterAwarded.jpeg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Train2104 (t • c) 00:20, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eduardo Montes-Bradley, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Public school ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Eduardo_Montes-Bradley check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Eduardo_Montes-Bradley?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:38, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:QI4007 Serie del Conocimiento.png
Thanks for uploading File:QI4007 Serie del Conocimiento.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:48, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Qualiton Catalogo 1973-1974.png
Thanks for uploading File:Qualiton Catalogo 1973-1974.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:49, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eduardo Montes-Bradley, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page WCVE ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Eduardo_Montes-Bradley check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Eduardo_Montes-Bradley?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:QI4007 Serie del Conocimiento.png
Thanks for uploading File:QI4007 Serie del Conocimiento.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:48, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Qualiton Catalogo 1973-1974.png
Thanks for uploading File:Qualiton Catalogo 1973-1974.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:49, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Albert J Paquin,MD.png
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Albert J Paquin,MD.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 15:04, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Samuel A Vest.png
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Samuel A Vest.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 15:04, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Samuel A. Vest, MD.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Samuel A. Vest, MD.jpg, which you've attributed to Thomas Charles Vest. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:42, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:AliceParkeronNewsweek.png
Thank you for uploading File:AliceParkeronNewsweek.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Premier at Paramount Theatre of Rita Dove.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Premier at Paramount Theatre of Rita Dove.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jonteemil (talk) 16:50, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
 * Discos Qualiton ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Discos_Qualiton check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Discos_Qualiton?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added links pointing to Congo, Toba, Bera and Zamba

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:30, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 10
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
 * Eduardo Montes-Bradley ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Eduardo_Montes-Bradley check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Eduardo_Montes-Bradley?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added a link pointing to Ansa
 * Samba on Your Feet ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Samba_on_Your_Feet check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Samba_on_Your_Feet?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added a link pointing to Clementina

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:02, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 17
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eduardo Montes-Bradley, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ansa ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Eduardo_Montes-Bradley check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Eduardo_Montes-Bradley?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:51, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Searching 4 Tabernero


The article Searching 4 Tabernero has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "I don't believe that this film meets the general notability guidelines, nor the notability guidelines for films. The references currently on the article don't appear to be enough to prove this film's notability, and there doesn't appear to be many more references/sources on the internet to prove its notability. Furthermore, the IMDb link for this film states that it is in 'post-production', and per WP:NFF, 'films that have already begun shooting, but have not yet been publicly released (theatres or video), should generally not have their own articles unless the production itself is notable per the notability guidelines'."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Seagull123  Φ  21:39, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for File:Sepultura Tabernero.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Sepultura Tabernero.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like (to release all rights),  (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * File copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 22:45, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Portrait of Alice Parker.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Portrait of Alice Parker.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 11:48, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Searching4Tabernero.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Searching4Tabernero.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 12:37, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:DVDJulianBondCover.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:DVDJulianBondCover.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 12:38, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Searching4Tabernero.png
Thanks for uploading File:Searching4Tabernero.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 12:38, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Pablo Tabernero.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Pablo Tabernero.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 01:49, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Alice (2020 film)


The article Alice (2020 film) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable film, does not have significant coverage by independent sources, does not meet WP:NF or WP:GNG"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BOVINEBOY 2008 10:55, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

File:TheEntertainmentHeraldNewsclip.jpeg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:TheEntertainmentHeraldNewsclip.jpeg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 14:18, 6 December 2020 (UTC) Whpq (talk) 14:18, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Alice (2020 film) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alice (2020 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Alice (2020 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BOVINEBOY 2008 10:43, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Wikimench100. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. ''For the image File:AliceOfficialPoster01.jpg you indicated that this was your own work, implying that you are either the director or someone involved with the film or the organization that produced it. If this is not your own work, please read over WP:COPYVIO.'' ReaderofthePack (formerly Tokyogirl79)  (｡◕‿◕｡)  04:15, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Actually, I see in this comment where you as much as state that you hold a conflict of interest. I would strongly, STRONGLY recommend that you not edit any articles with which you have a direct conflict of interest, especially as there are major issues with notability, at least in the article currently up for deletion. Given the issues, it is very much not in your best interest to make direct edits to articles. ReaderofthePack (formerly Tokyogirl79)  (｡◕‿◕｡)  04:20, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

December 2020
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. ReaderofthePack (formerly Tokyogirl79)  (｡◕‿◕｡)  04:30, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
 * I was going to bring this up at the COI noticeboard only at first, but when I went to compile the articles you've created or edited with a conflict of interest, the amount is quite frankly huge. Your edits are either to make or edit articles related to Heritage Film Project (including edits on the people or events that are the focus of their films), Eduardo Montes-Bradley, or people related to Montes-Bradley. You've been editing for years and given warnings that the articles you were creating had issues with notability and sourcing, yet I don't see where you've taken any of that to heart and instead have continued to create articles with sourcing issues - most recently with the Alice film. This gives off the strong impression that you are here first and foremost to promote  Eduardo Montes-Bradley and anything related to him. Even if your intentions were good, by not disclosing this on the articles' talk pages and trying to ensure that all of the pages met notability guidelines, you're kind of shooting yourself in the foot here.
 * I am willing to unblock you, but one of the main requirements will be that you cannot edit any articles related to Eduardo Montes-Bradley or create any articles related to him. Wikipedia is not a place to promote a person and their work. ReaderofthePack (formerly Tokyogirl79)  (｡◕‿◕｡)  04:36, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

I sincerely thank you for taking the time to help me clean up my articles. I often work alone, by myself, and you're right often around the Montes-Bradley, but also many others as well, and I have personally contacted many institutions and even Mr. Montes-Bradley himself to request their permission to submit photographs, or even as in the case of Montes-Bradley I wrote to him to ask if he would donate some of his photographs to Wikipedia which he has such as his portrait of Ta-Nehisi Coates which has been replicated all over the world. However, I understand your concerns and I put myself at your disposal to clarify the presumed conflict of interest. Once again, I like to take this opportunity to thank you and I hope that something good comes out of all the good work and that mistakes can be amended. Wikimench100 Wikimench100 (talk) 05:02, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. ReaderofthePack (formerly Tokyogirl79)  (｡◕‿◕｡)  04:57, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Thank you.

Orphaned non-free image File:Whitedocumentaryposter.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Whitedocumentaryposter.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:55, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:07, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)