User talk:Wikimjb

Removed external links to partners to address concern. Wikimjb (talk) 19:33, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

AfD Nomination: Immigration Advocates Network
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but all Wikipedia articles must meet our criteria for inclusion (see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Since it does not seem that Immigration Advocates Network meets these criteria, an editor has started a discussion about whether this article should be kept or deleted.

Your opinion on whether this article meets the inclusion criteria is welcome. Please contribute to the discussion by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Immigration Advocates Network. Don't forget to add four tildes ( ~ ) at the end of each of your comments to sign them.

Discussions such as these usually last seven days. In the meantime, you are free to edit the content of the article. Please do not remove the "articles for deletion" template (the box at the top). When the discussion has concluded, a neutral third party will consider all comments and decide whether or not to delete the article. Dawn Bard (talk) 17:58, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for not bothering to respond.
I find it interesting that when I take the time to explain that I might not be who you think I am, you simply delete the comment and don't bother to acknowledge that you MIGHT have misjudged me. Niteshift36 (talk) 19:43, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I deleted it because this is not about you or me. Find an article about immigration in the United States, such as this one (http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2009/06/02/stowaway_from_nigeria_imprisoned_in_mass_months_longer_than_courts_suggest/) and read the comments, like "Why not establish a labor camp system whereby illegal immigrants caught at the borders can earn their citizenship?!." Similar comments go on and on. This is why I question bias when an article about IAN is removed from the same categories of articles that have no sources and aren't subjected to notability standards that I can't even make sense of. If you're objective, help me make the article better. Otherwise, as I said at the beginning, don't make it about you and me. Wikimjb (talk) 03:42, 4 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Wait....you accuse me of bias because of something on my userpage (something you still refuse to specify) and THEN tell me that you don't want to make this personal? Maybe if you removed your accusation on the talk page and apologized for jumping to conclusions, it wouldn't seem personal. But right now, it sounds pretty hypocritical to me to insult me and then ask that it not be personal. Niteshift36 (talk) 03:52, 4 June 2009 (UTC)