User talk:Wikinerd2021

Your submission at Articles for creation: Emma Jonnz (May 31)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nearlyevil665 was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Emma Jonnz and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Emma Jonnz, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Emma_Jonnz Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Nearlyevil665&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Emma_Jonnz reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

nearlyevil 665  20:44, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

May 2021
Thank you for contributing to the article Draft:Emma Jonnz. However, please do not use unreliable sources such as blogs, your own website, websites and publications with a poor reputation for checking the facts or with no editorial oversight, expressing views that are widely acknowledged as extremist, that are promotional in nature, or that rely heavily on rumors and personal opinions, as one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. If you require further assistance, please look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse. Thank you. Kuru  (talk)  22:51, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Draft:Emma Jonnz, you may be blocked from editing. Kuru  (talk)  11:20, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

As it has become apparent that your account will be used solely for unconstructive editing, you have been indefinitely blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest it by adding the text to this page. Kuru  (talk)  11:29, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry. As you have repeatedly utilized junk and fake sources and now moved them into mainspace, I have disabled this account. You will need to clarify that you understand the problem, and also identify any conflict of interest you have with the topic before proceeding. Kuru   (talk)  11:29, 3 June 2021 (UTC)


 * I'd be happy to walk you through it. Just to start, will you please clarify your relationship to the subject of the article? Is this a paid activity? Kuru   (talk)  02:08, 4 June 2021 (UTC)


 * hi, not at all, i am a fan of the subject, been a fan for over a year and manage two fan pages on both instagram and twitter and was hoping to make a wiki article about her. i totally understand that every article needs to have references and that is why i try adding as many as i could find, it wasn’t my intention to add “junk”, i was just thinking by adding more one you could see them and then tell me yes they’re fine or no they’re good enough. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikinerd2021 (talk • contribs)


 * Got it. Unfortunately, you've tripped a lot of undisclosed paid editing alarms in your pattern of editing. Most, if not all, of the references you added were paid placement SEO farms, several of which exist only only as falsely-branded news sites with fake authors. I'll assume that you were unaware of those activities and I'll break them all down on the draft article's talk page. I'm willing to unblock you if you will agree to not create any more mainspace articles (limit your activities to the draft space), and not restore any more links that have been clearly pointed out as paid placement or spam. Kuru   (talk)  17:35, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

For sure, i understand and no i wasn’t aware. i guess we can delete the draft as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikinerd2021 (talk • contribs)
 * Okay, I've removed the block. Please avoid creating new articles in mainspace until you have a feel for the problem. I'll leave a detailed set of notes on the draft article's talk page.  Kuru   (talk)  02:32, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Emma Jonnz (Youtuber)
 The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Wikinerd2021 help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Wikinerd2021 (talk) 21:05, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Emma Jonnz for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Emma Jonnz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Emma Jonnz until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ... disco spinster   talk  23:52, 18 June 2021 (UTC)