User talk:Wikinewseditor

January 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Kolkata Derby has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:51, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Kolkata Derby was changed by Wikinewseditor (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.955707 on 2016-01-28T14:51:42+00:00.

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kolkata Derby with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. /wiae  /tlk  14:59, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Wikinewseditor, you are invited to the Teahouse!
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Kolkata Derby with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Dat GuyTalkContribs 16:07, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

January 2016
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Kolkata Derby. Dl2000 (talk) 22:24, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Edit warring at Kolkata Derby
Your recent editing history at Kolkata Derby shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Dl2000 (talk) 02:31, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

February 2016
Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:
 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list and
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! -- Rrburke (talk) 15:33, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Rrburke. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Mohun Bagan A.C., but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -- Rrburke (talk) 15:49, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. -- Rrburke (talk) 15:50, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Kolkata Derby with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. CAPTAIN RAJU ( ✉ ) 19:07, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further notice the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Mohun Bagan A.C.. Jim1138 (talk) 19:38, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Sourcing
As should be clear to you by now, judging by the above warnings on your talk page, and the number of times you've been reverted, you should source your material...per the WP:Verifiability policy. Read that policy. So, yes, you will continue to get reverted at the Kolkata Derby article if you are adding unsourced content there. Similar goes for edits you make elsewhere on Wikipedia. If you continue to engage in WP:Disruptive behavior, you should expect a WP:Block. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 21:04, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

WP:ANI
I reported you at WP:ANI. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 19:01, 10 March 2016 (UTC)